MustangWorks.com : Ford Forums - View Single Post - C&L vs. Pro-M Meters

RPM427 · 01-09-2003, 01:58 PM

The C&L uses the stock ford MAF sensor, it uses calibration tubes to "trick" the computer. The pro-M's are ussually recalibrated and should be more accurate, at least in theory. I have been using a C&L 76mm for a while and have had no problems with it. My car idles good and runs great.

Someone correct me if I am wrong, but I think the 73mm was discontiued.

01-09-2003, 01:58 PM	#8
RPM427 Registered Member Join Date: Aug 2001 Location: Huntington NY Posts: 573	The C&L uses the stock ford MAF sensor, it uses calibration tubes to "trick" the computer. The pro-M's are ussually recalibrated and should be more accurate, at least in theory. I have been using a C&L 76mm for a while and have had no problems with it. My car idles good and runs great. Someone correct me if I am wrong, but I think the 73mm was discontiued. __________________ -1993 Mustang, 900rwhp 03-04 cobra based 4v swap, full Griggs setup, project underway -1994 Ranger w/ 427cid windsor (daily beater) check it out!