View Single Post
Old 01-30-2003, 03:04 PM   #10
Mustang92
Drag Racer!
 
Mustang92's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 1999
Location: Lake Worth, FL USA
Posts: 757
Default

Quote:
Originally posted by SMOKE
i]"The '96-'98 4.6Ls produce the least amount of horsepower of any late model V-8 Mustang."[/i] - How much horsepower did the '93 GT compared to the '96?
Yes but HP is not the entire story. Look at weight of the two vehicles that is the big difference. Stock fox bodys can run low 14's all day long with a decent driver and a great driver in a 96-98 is lucky to pull down a mid 14 in perfect weather. Not that I'm trying to shoot down the modulars I personaly wouldn't trade my car for anything right now. But you have to keep in mind the overall picture and that is that the 96-98's were fairly slow for their power and it's due to being some of the heaviest cars since 79.

Bill
__________________
2000 GT
VRS O/R X, Dynomax Bullets, Steeda Pulleys, Pro-M 80MM, 4.30s, UPR Pro Series Suspension, UPR Tubular K-member, MAC Longtubes, Bullitt Intake, TKO, VT Engine Stage 1 NA Cams, SCT Tune.
285 RWHP/296 RWTQ
11.97 @ 113.20
M/M 100, 7085

www.uprproducts.com
www.ponyexpressperformance.com
www.modulardepot.com
Mustang92 is offline   Reply With Quote