I'd have to bet that it was 35 cfm over the Edelbrock as well. Also, the article says that there were a few other minor improvements over the Edelbrock design such as slightly straighter # 1 and #5 runners in the lower and some minor port massaging which may yield some minor improvements.
Of course, for $300 ($200 cheaper than Edelbrock's), and even minor improvements, it looks to be a steal. I may wait until some tests come out for it, but I do need an intake pretty badly. Also, it should match perfectly with their 70mm TB/EGR combo.
--nathan
|