Quote:
Originally posted by T88H34GSUPRA
No sore spot hit... It just gets kind of old when some one who doesn't own a Supra, or even know much about them goes on to a public forum and pretends he is an expert on them. You haven't even presented one fact or shown any proof to back up your statements. Your ignorance is showing through...
I'll race anyone from a dig or a roll.
|
Ok, you're right and I'm wrong. Is that what you wanna hear?
Your facts are going to be highly scrutinized on this board since they are obviously highly extraordinary at best for the Supra community.
You've presented nothing more than I...just typed or copied/pasted words. Your "proof" is no more evidentary value than those I've posted you eagerly criticize and discredit.
I guess everything I've read on Supra and other forums are incorrect. You and your buddies must have the only ones that transcend all others.
My comparison using a 1000HP / 400 TQ Supra was hypothetical and not to be taken literally. My point was the HP vs. TQ comparison most Supra owners boast about.
If you insist, I can dig up videos and posts of exactly what I'm talking about, but we both know it'd be a waste of time since you don't believe what I'm trying to say. It's just what's typical from the Supra community as a whole.
I can't (and apparetnly others on this board) believe you're denying the fact they're NOT legendary for great 1/4 mile times, high torque, 60 foot times or ET's. They ARE known for high HP, great trap speeds and acceleration from 60mph rolls....this is common knowledge amongst street automotive enthusiasts. This isn't even getting into the area of durability which is a whole other issue.
You seem to take this personally but it is not personal. Just what's
known in the street racing community.