Thread: Dumb 351w/t5 ?
View Single Post
Old 01-15-2004, 12:29 PM   #6
flyin 5.8
Registered Member
 
flyin 5.8's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Holland, Michigan
Posts: 73
Default

The car currently has a 4 cyl so building a 302 is out, I already have the 351 and it is a Windsor. As for the weight difference alum heads and dumping all the engine control wiring (going carb'd) gets you close to the stock front end weight. A K member with modified suspension geometry will also help the weight distribution, I'm also planing to move the engine back about 1/2"-3/4".

So it will bolt up?
__________________
If girls are made of sugar and spice, how come they taste like tuna?

"Nitrous is like a hot chick with an STD . . . you want to hit it, but your afraid of the consequences."
flyin 5.8 is offline   Reply With Quote