View Single Post
Old 11-03-2004, 01:12 PM   #4
bigred90gt
2 Stangs in the Stable
 
bigred90gt's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Baytown, TX
Posts: 1,209
Default Re: Mac prochamber or Bassani X-pipe with mac 5/8 longtubes + Am Thunder?

Quote:
Originally Posted by crazypete
I'm reading so many good things about that prochamber, I am very tempted to keep it.

But!

When I went to the speed shop last month, the guys outside wanted to look under the car to see what exhaust I was running since it sounded so sweet. You cant mess with that! That was equal shorties + bassani+ thunder

I was wondering more along hp/torque curves in the low-midrange which would be better for numbers.
I think with either midpipe, you will get about the same power. If there is any difference, it would be neglidgable. In which case, sound preference would come into play, and I think the prochamber sounds awsome!!! I have a 90 gt with your exact exhaust setup, and it sounds good. I had a prochamber and 2 chamber flows on my 01 gt and it sounded much better (except for the lack of lope from the cam in the 90).
__________________
'90 GT Under construction
Best E.T. = Fast @ High Speeds - OK So I Lie. So What!!!
04 F-150 STX 4.2L 5 spd
Rice Haters Club Member #128
bigred90gt is offline   Reply With Quote