View Single Post
Old 08-18-2005, 02:30 PM   #9
84LX89GT
Mustangs
 
84LX89GT's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2000
Posts: 1,938
Default Re: 4cyl mustang i need power

Quote:
Originally Posted by Meotchh
True but that was a turbocharged motor. You want to minimize the BP as much as possible on a forced induction motor. The N/A wants to see SOME back pressure & opening up to dual exhaust, like the SVO, is not a good idea for the N/A 2.3. The most I would do on the N/A is go for a high flow cat, less restrictive muffler, & single 2.5" exhaust is plenty big enough for this motor. Unless you serieously improve the flow through the motor. But this would involve spending quite a bit a cash.
Pipe diameter and length for resonance tuning and scavenging is what is important, backpressure slows exhaust from coming out of the head and diluting the air/fuel mixture on the intake cycle. If he went to 2.5" exhaust it would likely kill bottom end completely. The svo exhaust bolts behind the cat and is 2.25" dual, so it has the same effect as a low restriction muffler even with quieter mufflers. You want to keep diameter smaller near the manifold to increase velocity and the effect of the scavenging exhaust pulses. Once he gets a ways past the 105 horsepower range it might be a good idea to increase pipe diameter.
__________________
2005 Suzuki Hayabusa GSX1300-R

1980 Ford Thunderbird - 255 V8
ported heads, 5.0L ported stock headers, O.R. H-pipe and Flowmaster 2-chambers, dual roller timing chain
hi-po Mack Truck hood emblem

1985 Mustang GT 5.0L T5, F-303, GT40p, headers, off-road h, flowmasters, MSD stuff, etc.

Sold 02/06/04
1989 Mustang GT ET: 13.304@102.29 mph (5-24-03)

Sold - 1998 Mustang Cobra coupe, 1/4 mile - street tires: 13.843@103.41 (bone stock)
84LX89GT is offline   Reply With Quote