MustangWorks.com : Ford Forums - View Single Post

~The Jester~ · 03-13-2006, 08:05 AM

As near as we can tell, I'm putting out about 590 (flywheel) HP, not quite the numbers you guys are looking at, but it's up there.

I'm running a TKO II, and absolutely LOVE it. I would never even think about going automatic, that's just me though.

Here in the real world, "slush" boxes are waaaay more dependable, and tons more consistant on the track. Like dragstang said, when you start making that much power, ie faster/quicker, that leaves alot less time for rowing gears. From what I've seen, only about 1 in 10 "high HP" cars is a true stickshift. Not counting Lencos/Libertys clutchless Gforces, etc etc.

03-13-2006, 08:05 AM	#8
~The Jester~ Rat Killer Join Date: Aug 2002 Location: Cold ass Ohio Posts: 1,143	Re: This years dyno results 2006 As near as we can tell, I'm putting out about 590 (flywheel) HP, not quite the numbers you guys are looking at, but it's up there. I'm running a TKO II, and absolutely LOVE it. I would never even think about going automatic, that's just me though. Here in the real world, "slush" boxes are waaaay more dependable, and tons more consistant on the track. Like dragstang said, when you start making that much power, ie faster/quicker, that leaves alot less time for rowing gears. From what I've seen, only about 1 in 10 "high HP" cars is a true stickshift. Not counting Lencos/Libertys clutchless Gforces, etc etc. __________________ d-Con Racing "Nothing fancy, just 347 inches of RAT POISON!" MICE need not apply.....