View Single Post
Old 02-22-2001, 03:00 PM   #5
Rev
Registered Member
 
Rev's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 1998
Location: Houston, Tx.
Posts: 3,887
Post

I agree, they are worth the money. Mine is optimistic both in ET and MPH. I ran it at the track back in '99 to test it out. The following runs are:

1.) Track 14.17/ no mph.....G-Tech 13.90/103.2

2.) Track 14.17/96.7........G-Tech 13.91/103.7

3.) Track 14.22/96.7........G-Tech 13.93/103.5

4.) Track 14.24/97.1........G-Tech 13.90/104.7

Though these don't actually agree, they are all consistent. With my G-Tech and with my car, I just add about .3 to the ET and subtract about 6 or 7 MPH from the the trap speed and figure that's about right. Might be that G-Techs differ unit to unit and also may measure some cars performance better than other cars. This is my take on these gizmos anyway. If I had to, I would buy one again.

Rev

------------------
'66 Coupe, 306, 300 HP, C-4, 13.97 e.t., 100.3 mph
1/4 mi.
Rev is offline   Reply With Quote