View Single Post
Old 06-29-2001, 04:39 PM   #17
bada$$lx
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Cool

Oh come on, let's not start the old Camaro vs Mustang debate and how Stangs need work to beat Camaros......stock: 40_more cubes, 70+ hp more, .7 liters more etc etc etc.....it's obvious that a '90's Stang would need work to beat a new WS6/SS, since there starting off w/ such a disadvantage.

------------------
'90 LX 5.0; 12K original miles (no sh*&); 3.55 gears; pulleys;Edelbrock Performer Heads; BBK shorties; MSD 6AL box w/ blaster 2 coil; Motorsport E303 cam; Pro-M 75mm MAF; BBK 70mm TB; Eibach spring kit; Southside welded subs; K&N cone filter charger; Hurst shifter; fiberglass turbo hood; A/C-less; rear seat-less; cat-less; 2 chamber Flos; Corbeau racing seats (fronts);
30# injectors; JMS Chip; 190 lb fp; TFS track heat Intake (12.299 @ 113)
  Reply With Quote