MustangWorks.com : Ford Forums - View Single Post

97snakedriver · 01-21-2001, 11:50 PM

Yep. That's what they were rated at. But it gets a little weird in that Ford changed how they did their ratings, so comparing a 94 GT engine to a 93 or 89 GT isn't as straight forward as it would seem.

01-21-2001, 11:50 PM	#5
97snakedriver Registered Member Join Date: May 1999 Location: Blacksburg, VA Posts: 1,526	Yep. That's what they were rated at. But it gets a little weird in that Ford changed how they did their ratings, so comparing a 94 GT engine to a 93 or 89 GT isn't as straight forward as it would seem.