Thread: low 13's
View Single Post
Old 02-25-2001, 03:09 AM   #16
fastang
Registered Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: santa ana ca
Posts: 1,349
Post

Yello95GT, The 93 Cobra is substantialy quicker than the 94-95 because its lighter and it has a better CPU. The 94-95 cobras have a HORRIBLE cpu that cuts out the timing in between shifts. Thats why they typicaly run 14.4-14.2 instead of the 13.90's that the 93 runs.
Mustangman777, a 94 cpu should work fine and you can probalby find one cheap in a junkyard since 5.0's are always getting raced and wrecked.
KillerCanary, I was asking why your car was a stick or an auto because my manual hardtop hit a 14.67 at 96 mph stock. All I did was replace the worn clutch when I bought the car and took it to the track the next week, stock air filter and all. I havent had any problems with my idle after the cam install at all. It sounds great and makes power right where I want it at 4-6 grand which is right where I end up at with my 355's. I would defintitely reccomend this cam. It worked fine with my stock heads even after I milled the $hit out of them.

------------------
95GT B303 cam, 1.7 rockers, 65mm TB, 73mm MAF, milled heads, 355's K&N, off road pipes, pulleys, msd coil, 9mm wires, Tremec 3550, Pro5.0 shifter,10.5 Motorsport clutch, weld in subframe connectors
fastang is offline   Reply With Quote