camaroboy...
I haven't been reading this thread as I put my $0.02 earlier. It's obvious you are dumb as rocks.
The 1985-1992 Mustang 5.0's ate the Fbody's up. Everywhere, including handling. Actually, the 94+ Mustang GT's handle better than the Fbodies. You had a nice little edge there in 1993 though. Good job.
GM has been putting together responses for Mustang's that haven't even come out yet. The SS as a response to the 96 Cobra, the LT1 as a response to the rumor the 4.6L SOHC would be a beast availible in the 1994GT. They slap some car together, hold the nose on with duct tape (new fbody's, take a look under there some time), and ship it out so they can beat the upgrades Ford does to it's ponycar. I laughed when Chevy announced the Z06. Appearently, they felt threatened by the Cobra R, they must have gotten tired of having their asses kicked on the race tracks when the last one came out in 1995?
As far as the Fbody being too expensive, the MSRP on the Z28 is lower than the GT. There are reason's the Mustang outsells the Fbody over 3:1. They're called quality, substance, and reputation.
|