***Just out of curiosity, how many liter bikes have you logged hours and hours of time on there Unit?You are correct on one thing, I doubt anyone on this forum could ride a 929 to it's fullest potential, but to make such statements that seem to "parallel" the mags is quite humorous.....There are those who read about the great bikes and those who ride them
***One more thing......dyno charts mean everything to a poser....nuff said
How come you didn't asked me how many hours I've logged on liter bikes? ;o) Actually people that have "great" bikes, also read about them. But nice comment? GEEZ. Dyno charts wouldn't mean anything to a "poser". Because they'd be too worried about having a beginner friendly bike. ;o) Tell me this, when the 929's came out, they were around $10,000. After a few months, when no-one wanted them, all the shops around here had them for $7999, why? Anyway people who like to go fast, and care about performance actually look at dyno charts, imagine that! Why buy a bike with less power? I will not buy a 2002 R1, if it doesn't have more rwhp power than the GSXR1000, plain and simple. I don't want a smooth, beg. friendly bike, I want a hard hitting beast. Horsepower is the main factor, if it wasn't the Gixxer wouldn't be the "best bike" as of now. I mean if the Gixxer had the hp as the 929 it surely wouldn't be the #1 bike. But all people have different tastes, so be it. The horsepower is what does it for me, and DYNO charts read hp.
-1989 GT, not stock.
-2000 Camaro SS-A4,
13.4's bone stock.
-1989 Chevy S-10, EX. Cab-383(500+hp on motor), tubbed, trick flow heads, trick flow pistons, etc... autometer phantom gauges, "built" 700R4, roll cage, lexan back window, corbeau seats, R.H.S. 5 harnesses, Fuel cell, convo pro wheels, 15x14's with 29x18.5 M/T'S on back, 15x4's on front, nitrous, and so much more!
[This message has been edited by 1BAD89 (edited 10-23-2001).]
|