Quote:
Originally posted by NO SLO PK:
Regarding that "legendary 454", it BETTER be making some decent torque...after all, it's got 454 cubes for crying out loud. What it lacks in rod ratio it makes up for in size.
|
Just illustrating a point
, the 347 gets a bad rap for a short R/S ratio and I just wanted to show an engine that was considered highly successful and one that had a shorter R/S than the 347 with a 5.4" rod. I think that BOP 455's had even crappier R/S ratios? but were pretty successful as perfromance engines.