

© Copyright 1995 thru 2008 - The Mustang Works™. All Rights Reserved.
MustangWorks.com is designed and hosted by Aero3 Media.
MustangWorks.com is designed and hosted by Aero3 Media.
![]() |
#1 |
Registered Member
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: Staging lane
Posts: 4,337
|
![]() My car is an entirely different animal since I installed the heads, intake, and FPR......It revs to 6500 easy........Where should I be shifting at . It feels like it pulls all the way to 6500rpms???
__________________
92' LX-Big brakes, Lots and lots of suspension, GT40X heads, Ported cobra intake, stock cam, Vortech SC trim. 00' Lightning-Stock 88'CRX-13 second ego killer |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
Registered Member
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Jacksonville, FL
Posts: 706
|
![]() I've got a similar setup, and I've got a date with a dyno this Wednesday at 3. I'll post the curve and we'll both figure out where to shift.
__________________
1988 GT Convertible 331 10:1 TW heads, GT-40 intake, MSD, TRW flattops, B Cam w/ 1.7's, MAC exhaust, 24's, 70 TB, 76 MAF, 3.73's, Pro 5.0, Koni's, Anderson PMS, Wideband 02, yatta, yatta... One week with new motor, two speeding tickets...joy |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
Registered Member
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: Concord, MA, USA
Posts: 264
|
![]() What cam do you have?
6500 seems high. I would think with a mild cam you would be more in the 5500 range. With the stock computer, you're not hitting the rev limiter? I'd like to see what the dyno says.
__________________
1995 GT Black- Edelbrock- 6037's,Intake, cam,70mm TB,75mm pro-m,Equal length headers,3.73's and all the bolt on's. SOLD 12/5/01 NEW! Mercedes-Benz SLK 230 Red/Black. Kleemann boost increase on the way! |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
Registered Member
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Taxachusetts
Posts: 374
|
![]() Is it just me, or does that seem awfully high for a stock bottom-end?
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 |
Registered Member
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: Concord, MA, USA
Posts: 264
|
![]() No, it's not just you, Jeb.
Seems high for the cam, bottom end, and maybe the valve train. There has to be an error with the tact or something.
__________________
1995 GT Black- Edelbrock- 6037's,Intake, cam,70mm TB,75mm pro-m,Equal length headers,3.73's and all the bolt on's. SOLD 12/5/01 NEW! Mercedes-Benz SLK 230 Red/Black. Kleemann boost increase on the way! |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#6 |
Registered Member
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: Staging lane
Posts: 4,337
|
![]() My car does not have a rev limiter .....I dont know if the previous owner did something to it or what?
I was using the stock tach but I though it must be off. I went home and hooked an aftermarket tach up and my tach shows to be dead on up to 4000 but then about 500rpms off from there up so my car still pulls up to 6000rpms instead of 6500. That still seems high to me. It appears I will have to shift at about 6000rpms. Oh yeah....I have the stock cam.
__________________
92' LX-Big brakes, Lots and lots of suspension, GT40X heads, Ported cobra intake, stock cam, Vortech SC trim. 00' Lightning-Stock 88'CRX-13 second ego killer |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#7 |
I'd rather be basketweaving
Join Date: Feb 2000
Location: Indianapolis
Posts: 2,551
|
![]() the stock rev limiter is 6250RPM. So I'm sure your tach is just off and you arent quite there yet even though its reading 6500
With the stock cam, mine always ran the best at the track shifting it at like 5400 (on an autometer tach). And seeing how our combo's are pretty much the same, thats what I would reccomend for you too. good luck - Drew
__________________
NMRA O/C 9516 NA pumpgas stickshift 347 10.65@125.6, 6.73@100, 1.41 60ft |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#8 |
Registered Member
Join Date: Jun 1999
Location: Walker, MI, USA
Posts: 1,202
|
![]() I have the stock cam and it Pulls Very hard to 6200 I bet 5900-6100 is the Max HP on it I will get it on a dyno this year sometime.
__________________
Engine: steel mounts, Under drive pulleys, K&N, GT-40 Intake ported Lower, No power steering, No A/C, Mac cold intake, 65MM TB, 255 Fuel pump, 24's, AFR 165 58cc, Rocker Arms 1.7with the stock Cam, 1 5/8 short headers, offRoad X-pipe Drive Train: 3.55, T-5 with a Pro 5.0 shifter 12.656@107.71MPH See It at www.T-racing.com/mustang.htm |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#9 |
Registered Member
Join Date: May 1999
Posts: 5,246
|
![]() I don't really see a problem with running the stock bottom end to 6500rpm. I'd be more concerned about the valvetrain.
Wigged out E7's can flow up to about 220cfm with CNC jobs and bigger valves. With the stock cam, I'd expect best shift performance to be below 6000rpm. The stock tach can get really crazy up in the r's. I took mine to fuel cutoff to see how far the tach was off. I hit 7000rpm on the factory tach before the 6250rpm fuel cutoff kicked in. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#10 |
Registered Member
Join Date: Feb 1999
Location: Utica, Michigan
Posts: 2,631
|
![]() You will never make peak power at 6000 RPM with a stock cam.
My combo is a rebuilt 302 with an E-303 with 1.72 rockers, mildly ported TFS TW heads, Holley Systemax intake, 65 mm throttle body, 24 lb injectors, C&L 73 meter, and equal shorties. My peak power on the dyno was at 5800 RPM. Which means I should shift at approx. 6000 RPM for the best time slip. If you are reading your stock tachometer, it is waaaay off. They all are. Mine reads 7 grand when my Autometer says 6000. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
GM Engines | BLOCKER | Blue Oval Lounge | 2 | 04-13-2004 12:35 AM |
Speed Secret # 3 | jim_howard_pdx | Windsor Power | 13 | 11-09-2002 10:35 AM |
Edelbrock RPM Package | jim_howard_pdx | Classic Mustangs | 2 | 10-28-2002 04:57 PM |
Experience with Edelbrock RPM Package | jim_howard_pdx | Windsor Power | 0 | 10-27-2002 01:10 AM |
Formula for figuring RPM | o2superstang | Modular Madness | 0 | 06-27-2002 04:19 PM |