

© Copyright 1995 thru 2008 - The Mustang Works™. All Rights Reserved.
MustangWorks.com is designed and hosted by Aero3 Media.
MustangWorks.com is designed and hosted by Aero3 Media.
![]() |
#1 |
Registered Member
Join Date: May 2001
Location: new york, new york
Posts: 5
|
![]() Just got a rebuild on my '83 5.0. Modest: cam, 3-angle valve grind, mated to long headers and dual 2 1/2 inch exhausts. I figure I have 250-300 hp. Carb was rejetted stock and now needs replacement. What should I get?? Intake manifold? I live in New Jersey and drive so its got to pass inspection. Also: what hood should I get to better feed the K&N with the new top element?
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
Junior Member
Join Date: Mar 1999
Location: Ventura, California
Posts: 8,981
|
![]() You need to be more specific. What's the compression? What are the lift and duration numbers on the cam? Which heads, and what's been done to them? If you have a stock carb/intake/heads and a mild cam, you are no where near the horsepower you think you are. List the specifics and we'll go from there.
Take care, -Chris
__________________
Webmaster: Rice Haters Club Jim Porter Racing Peckerwoods Pit Stop Support Your Local
RED & WHITE! |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
Registered Member
Join Date: May 2001
Location: new york, new york
Posts: 5
|
![]() I'm sure you're right on the hp - wishful thinking for sure since it dies when I stab the gas! Be posting the details asap.
thanks |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
Mustang Addict
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: McKinney, TX
Posts: 1,294
|
![]() I put the Edelbrock Performer intake, cam, and 600cfm 4-barrel package on my 79 pace car and it really woke it up, especially with dual exhaust. Those parts are all smog legal. If your cam is lumpier than stock but fairly mild, it should work well with the Performer intake. If you plan on changing your combo later, you may want to get a Holley instead of the Edelbrock as they seem to be a little easier to tune.
Definitely get some heads if you are serious about making power. There is no way you will make even close to 300hp with the stock heads that came on the 83 as they have pitifully small valves.
__________________
Strike down the unroadworthy! 2000 GT Atl. Blue: '03 Cobra motor - 465rwhp/473rwtq, T-56 6-speed, full MM TA/PH & tubular K-member suspension, Saleen body, 17" Torq-Thrust II's, M/T ET Street radials, and lots more '94 Rio Red Cobra: All the bolt-ons, 3.73s |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 |
Registered Member
Join Date: Dec 1998
Location: Richmond, Virginia
Posts: 449
|
![]() the 83 should have the same size valves as any later 5.0...
I just took the heads off of my 82, and the valves are the same as those in an E7TE. It's just that the ports were terrible on the early 80's heads - that and 67.5cc combustion chambers. If you think that the air bump in an E7TE's exhaust port is restrictive, look at these pre-87 heads.
__________________
1982 Mustang GT |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
to carb, or not to carb...this is my question. | black86notch | Windsor Power | 4 | 08-06-2002 08:24 PM |
Carb Woahs | RoadWarrior | Classic Mustangs | 4 | 07-27-2002 11:06 AM |
'65 Carb Question | Wendell Allen | Classic Mustangs | 3 | 07-13-2002 04:54 AM |
efi to carb. /? | WADS56 | Windsor Power | 0 | 09-26-2001 12:45 AM |
new carb..but how much cfm?? | 69PonyRider | Classic Mustangs | 4 | 09-13-2001 07:59 AM |