![SEARCH](http://www.mustangworks.com/images/search.png)
![The Mustang Works](http://www.mustangworks.com/images/mw_footer_logo.gif)
© Copyright 1995 thru 2008 - The Mustang Works™. All Rights Reserved.
MustangWorks.com is designed and hosted by Aero3 Media.
MustangWorks.com is designed and hosted by Aero3 Media.
|
![]() |
#1 |
Registered Member
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Troy, Ohio
Posts: 38
|
![]() Why does the EEC "need" to be from JUST a A9L GT only ??
Wouldn't another EEC-IV from another application work instead ? Why couldn't any of these (below) work ?? OEM Binaries A9L - 89-93 5.0L Mustang 5-spd A3M - 93 5.0L Mustang 5-spd A3M1 - 93 5.0L Mustang 5-spd X3Z - 93 5.0L Cobra 5-spd A9P - 89-93 5.0L Mustang Auto A9S - 88-93 5.0L Mustang California C3W - 89-93 5.0L Mustang Auto DA1 - 87 5.0L Mustang 5-spd J4J1 - 94-95 5.0L SVT Cobra 5-spd T4M0 - 94-95 5.0L GT Vert 5-spd U4P0 - 94-95 5.0L GT Auto WH40 - 94-95 5.0L GT ZA0 - 95 Cobra R D9S - Lincoln LSC ZXA3 LLX3 CCA1 CCA0 AOL2 AOL3 The above info was obtained from; -->> EEC-IV Tech info from Tom Cloud <<--- |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
Registered Member
Join Date: Oct 1999
Location: Pierre Part, La. U.S.A.
Posts: 1,850
|
![]() I would think that any one of them would work. Why are you converting?
__________________
88workcar 1988 Mustang LX 342. 417rwhp @ 6800. 28 X 10 ET Drag, 4.30s, 10.69 @ 126.43 1.42 60ft. 11.13 @ 127.7 on BFGs 1.72 60ft Rice Hater # 42 To be old and wise, You must first be young and stupid ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 | |
Registered Member
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Troy, Ohio
Posts: 38
|
![]() Quote:
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 | |
Get down.....
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: Room 103
Posts: 2,095
|
![]() Quote:
![]()
__________________
Cobra brakes are on! Finally..... ------------------------------------------------ |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 |
Registered Member
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Surrey, BC, Canada
Posts: 19
|
![]() None of the 94/95 computers or the lincoln computers will work because it just dont haha dont ask me why. Ive tried and it just doesnt work. Now your better off just getting the A9L computer there the most common. You can use them in any conversion that you want to do. sometimes its better not to ask questions and just do it
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#6 |
Registered Member
Join Date: Oct 1999
Location: Pierre Part, La. U.S.A.
Posts: 1,850
|
![]() SRV1- I'm not gonna do it.
![]()
__________________
88workcar 1988 Mustang LX 342. 417rwhp @ 6800. 28 X 10 ET Drag, 4.30s, 10.69 @ 126.43 1.42 60ft. 11.13 @ 127.7 on BFGs 1.72 60ft Rice Hater # 42 To be old and wise, You must first be young and stupid ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#7 | |
Registered Member
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Troy, Ohio
Posts: 38
|
![]() Quote:
How about the details. Are the fuel tables in the EEC-IV the only consideration (other than changing Pinouts ??) I'm not buying the fact that the A9L is the ONLY EEC-IV that'll work for this conversion. As we know, they're getting harder to find and expensive when you do find one. So WHY are they considered the BEST/ONLY EEC-IV that will work ?? I'd really like to know.... |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#8 |
Registered Member
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Columbus, OH
Posts: 100
|
![]() Any of them will work. Just stay in the ECM family that is for your year or body style:
A9L -- 88-93 Mustang (5-speed) includes A9L, A3M, A3M1, D3D1, X3Z, S0Z A9M -- 88-93 Mustang (auto) includes A9M, A9P, C3W, C3W1 A9S -- 88-93 Mustangs (CA.) includes A9S, 8LD ZA0 -- 94-95 Mustang includes T4M0, U4P0, W4H0, J4J1, ZA0 Murdock |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#9 | |
Registered Member
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Phoenix
Posts: 2
|
![]() Was there just a timing change on the CA computers, or was there also a wiring difference from the A9M?
Quote:
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#10 |
Registered Member
Join Date: Oct 1999
Location: Pierre Part, La. U.S.A.
Posts: 1,850
|
![]() Permawired Check the dates on a post before u reply, That one was from 02 or 03. But then I replied so u never know.
__________________
88workcar 1988 Mustang LX 342. 417rwhp @ 6800. 28 X 10 ET Drag, 4.30s, 10.69 @ 126.43 1.42 60ft. 11.13 @ 127.7 on BFGs 1.72 60ft Rice Hater # 42 To be old and wise, You must first be young and stupid ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#11 | |
Registered Member
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Phoenix
Posts: 2
|
![]() Quote:
![]() After all the computer info I've read over the last couple weeks I'm going to just get a TwEECer to tune the comp to start... |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#12 |
Registered Member
Join Date: Oct 1999
Location: Pierre Part, La. U.S.A.
Posts: 1,850
|
![]() Good deal, keep us posted, need any help let me know.
__________________
88workcar 1988 Mustang LX 342. 417rwhp @ 6800. 28 X 10 ET Drag, 4.30s, 10.69 @ 126.43 1.42 60ft. 11.13 @ 127.7 on BFGs 1.72 60ft Rice Hater # 42 To be old and wise, You must first be young and stupid ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#13 |
Registered Member
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Seattle, Wa.
Posts: 175
|
![]() While the 94-95 EEC processor will work there are a few differences that you should be aware of. 1st off the 94-95 EEC was designed for a new model car with some important differences in it. EEC runs a 2 speed electric fan, no big deal. The Major change had to do with Ford trying to deal with a rash of 5 speed trans failures believe it or not. So to address the problem the 94-95 EEC was set up to pull timming out of the ignition on every gear change to soften the "blow " to the trans on shifts. 2nd, timming is pulled out after reaching about 92mph to cut down on the torque load that the trans was seeing in 3-5th gears depending of rear gear ratio. Swaping in a 93 EEC into a 94-95 5.0 usually netted about a .5 sec quarter improvement. Pro-M makes a conversion kit for just such a swap, it also address the electric fan function for the 94-95 that the 93 EEC cannot provide. So I would not use a 94-95 EEc myself unless there just was no other option at the time.
__________________
No matter how much you spend, or how much you prepare, there is ALWAYS someone else faster or quicker than YOU!!!!!!!!!! |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#14 | |
Registered Member
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Troy, Ohio
Posts: 38
|
![]() Good info!
Quote:
Why won't the 89-93 Mark VII EEC-IVs work ??? |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#15 |
Registered Member
Join Date: Oct 1998
Location: Birmingham, Alabama, USA
Posts: 12
|
![]() The 94-95 computers (T4MO) will work..... but you have to re-pin the injector wires. Just look at the 87-93 pin-out and the 94-95 pin-outs to see the difference....
I know because when I initially converted my 86 to Mass-air, I only had a 95 5 spd processor. Now running the 9AL.... Teddy
__________________
Gearbanger says: If you can't find em, grind em. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
MAF conversion | Jerry77 | Windsor Power | 6 | 08-10-2004 07:20 PM |
What all do you need to do rear disc conversion w/ SN95 Parts | KG88GT | Windsor Power | 1 | 07-29-2003 01:45 PM |
questions about maf conversion | spankaveli | Windsor Power | 10 | 10-19-2002 02:46 PM |
mass air 87GT conversion | greydan | Windsor Power | 3 | 01-02-2002 07:57 PM |
Baer vs. Ford 5-lug Disc Brake Conversion | RMARIANI | Windsor Power | 3 | 04-05-2001 03:18 PM |