
                    © Copyright 1995 thru 2008 - The Mustang Works™. All Rights Reserved.
MustangWorks.com is designed and hosted by Aero3 Media.
                    
                  
                MustangWorks.com is designed and hosted by Aero3 Media.
| 		
			
			 | 
		#1 | 
| 
			
			
			
			 Registered Member 
			
			
		
			
			
			Join Date: Mar 1999 
				Location: Canada 
				
				
					Posts: 66
				 
				
				
				
				 | 
	
	
	
		
		
			
			 I just finished with my dyno guy and he recommended a phenolic spacer. There's no way I'll get a 1" under my hood (it already touches the matterial under the hood) but I was thinking a 3/8" might work. I don't want to buy a cowl hood if possible because then I would just want a 351 (hehehehe). Do these things work???? I'm getting so close to the 12's now I need real results to get me there. I was also told to get an electric fan, but I'm scared of overheating. What do you guys think?? My car is a daily driver and will attack corvettes and LS-1's without being provoked. 
		
	
		
		
		
		
		
		
		
		
		
	
	 | 
| 
		 | 
	
	
	
		
		
		
		
			 
		
		
		
		
		
		
			
		
		
		
	 | 
| 		
			
			 | 
		#2 | 
| 
			
			
			
			 Moderator 
			
			
		
			
				
			
			
			Join Date: Sep 1998 
				Location: Grand Rapids, Michigan, USA 
				
				
					Posts: 1,001
				 
				
				
				
				 | 
	
	
	
		
		
			
			 If it's EFI, the only thing a spacer will do is lengthen the runners, giving you more low end torque (overall).  Not exactly the thing for more top end, so you may be better off with another intake for best results.  Was the dyno operator not impressed with the low end of the car or what?  Scan & post some torque curves for us, please....and also a list of modifications.  I'm shooting in the dark without more info. 
		
	
		
		
		
		
		
		
			If it's a carbureted application, I really don't know. ![]() 
				__________________ 
		
		
		
		
		
		
	
	Capri306, Moderator The Mustang Works Online 1979 Mercury Capri 1987 5.0L Mustang LX Notchback 1993 5.8L Eddie Bauer Bronco  
			 | 
| 
		 | 
	
	
	
		
		
		
		
			 
		
		
		
		
		
		
			
		
		
		
	 | 
| 		
			
			 | 
		#3 | 
| 
			
			
			
			 Registered Member 
			
			
		
			
				
			
			
			Join Date: Sep 2002 
				Location: Boston 
				
				
					Posts: 592
				 
				
				
				
				 | 
	
	
	
		
		
			
			 For a carb'ed application, they most definitely do work. They keep the carb from cooking off and make a small change in low end torque. For a EFI, they will keep the intake a little bit cooler and thats about all the good they will do for a long runner EFI intake. You should also bypass the intake EGR spacer coolant line if you're gonna bother to do this. No sense insulating the intake below if your heating it at the top. The slightly lower intake temp will make slightly cooler and slightly denser air enter the motor. Worth a hp or two. I'd do it if you can make one fit.  
		
	
		
		
		
		
		
		
			I ripped out that insulatiing pad the first thing when I got the car. Rip it out and go phelonic. Dont get a cowl hood, every idiot in a jetta will try and race you and every cop will be drooling to give you a ticket. 
				__________________ 
		
		
		
		
		
		
	
	91 GT Carb conversion, holley 600 double pumper, edelbrock performer intake, FMS "C" drop springs, march 1000 underdrive pullies, crane 1.7 roller rockers, GT-40P headers, bassani x pipe, american thunder catback, FMS 4.56's, msd aL6, trunkmount battery, A/C eliminator kit, 3000 stall tci streetfighter, AOD with transgo kit, A+ servo, 300M hardened lockup shaft, kevlar bands and 28,000 gvw trans cooler, 3 core radiator, 300 lbs stripped with a full interior  | 
| 
		 | 
	
	
	
		
		
		
		
			 
		
		
		
		
		
		
			
		
		
		
	 | 
| 		
			
			 | 
		#4 | 
| 
			
			
			
			 dude5l 
			
			
		
			
				
			
			
			Join Date: May 2001 
				Location: Grande Prairie, Alberta, Canada 
				
				
					Posts: 603
				 
				
				
				
				 | 
	
	
	
		
		
			
			 I don't know what kind of intake you have, but I know my Typhoon rubs a bit on the hood even without the insulation on. I have a nice little polished spot on one corner  
		
	
		
		
		
		
		
		
			 . I'm fighting to keep the stock hood as long as possible to keep the "sleeper" look. I don't think the spacer will help thet much.
				__________________ 
		
		
		
		
		
		
	
	Good luck! Brad R. 1992 L.X. 5.0 coupe MODS: A few little bolt ons ![]() New Best time ...11.60 @ 128 mph @ 2000+ ft altitude. Rice Haters Club member #39 Users rides #2542  | 
| 
		 | 
	
	
	
		
		
		
		
			 
		
		
		
		
		
		
			
		
		
		
	 | 
| 		
			
			 | 
		#5 | 
| 
			
			
			
			 Registered Member 
			
			
		
			
				
			
			
			Join Date: Sep 2002 
				Location: Boston 
				
				
					Posts: 592
				 
				
				
				
				 | 
	
	
	
		
		
			
			 Back in my EFI days, I had a cobra upper,lower and a standard thickness round hole style phenolic spacer and I had no interference problems even with the hood pad. Stock hood and all with no "sanded spot". I wonder why some people have problems and some dont. Maybe my motor mounts had conveniently collapsed and I didnt know it =P 
		
	
		
		
		
		
		
		
			
				__________________ 
		
		
		
		
		
		
	
	91 GT Carb conversion, holley 600 double pumper, edelbrock performer intake, FMS "C" drop springs, march 1000 underdrive pullies, crane 1.7 roller rockers, GT-40P headers, bassani x pipe, american thunder catback, FMS 4.56's, msd aL6, trunkmount battery, A/C eliminator kit, 3000 stall tci streetfighter, AOD with transgo kit, A+ servo, 300M hardened lockup shaft, kevlar bands and 28,000 gvw trans cooler, 3 core radiator, 300 lbs stripped with a full interior  | 
| 
		 | 
	
	
	
		
		
		
		
			 
		
		
		
		
		
		
			
		
		
		
	 | 
| 		
			
			 | 
		#6 | 
| 
			
			
			
			 Registered Member 
			
			
		
			
				
			
			
			Join Date: Apr 2001 
				Location: Staging lane 
				
				
					Posts: 4,337
				 
				
				
				
				 | 
	
	
	
		
		
			
			 All a "spacer does is increase runner length.  But a "Phenolic spacer" Stops the transfer of heat from the lower to upper intake. 
		
	
		
		
		
		
		
		
			
				__________________ 
		
		
		
		
		
		
	
	92' LX-Big brakes, Lots and lots of suspension, GT40X heads, Ported cobra intake, stock cam, Vortech SC trim. 00' Lightning-Stock 88'CRX-13 second ego killer  | 
| 
		 | 
	
	
	
		
		
		
		
			 
		
		
		
		
		
		
			
		
		
		
	 | 
| 		
			
			 | 
		#7 | |
| 
			
			
			
			 Registered Member 
			
			
		
			
				
			
			
			Join Date: Mar 2002 
				Location: Miami, FL 
				
				
					Posts: 54
				 
				
				
				
				 | 
	
	
	
		
		
			
			 Quote: 
	
 ![]() 
				__________________ 
		
		
		
		
		
		
	
	Nelson 1990 Mustang LX 5.0 http://fiveoh.homestead.com  | 
|
| 
		 | 
	
	
	
		
		
		
		
			 
		
		
		
		
		
		
			
		
		
		
	 | 
| 		
			
			 | 
		#8 | 
| 
			
			
			
			 Registered Member 
			
			
		
			
				
			
			
			Join Date: Oct 1998 
				Location: Rogers, MN 
				
				
					Posts: 2,089
				 
				
				
				
				 | 
	
	
	
		
		
			
			 You can get a phenolic spacer that blocks the exhaust gas passage.  This will allow you to remove the coolant lines from the EGR spacer.  Doing this will actually make your upper intake pretty cool.  When I had a 1" spacer, I could touch the upper intake after running the engine for a while and it felt like my car was parked. 
		
	
		
		
		
		
		
		
			Seeing the dyno graph would definitely be a big help for people offering advice. 
				__________________ 
		
		
		
		
		
		
	
	351W 89 Mustang GT Convertible  | 
| 
		 | 
	
	
	
		
		
		
		
			 
		
		
		
		
		
		
			
		
		
		
	 | 
| 		
			
			 | 
		#9 | 
| 
			
			
			
			 Registered Member 
			
			
		
			
			
			Join Date: Mar 1999 
				Location: Canada 
				
				
					Posts: 66
				 
				
				
				
				 | 
	
	
	
		
		
			
			 My dyno sheet was 251hp at 5700rpm and 270.5 ft/lbs at 4200, this is at 3500 ft above sea level and the air was kind of crappy. For reference I watched 2 stockish LS-1 vettes going at it that night at the strip and they were running 14.1 and 13.9 (I run mid to lower 13's  
		
	
		
		
		
		
		
		
		
		
		
		
			 ) . My car is a 91 loaded GT 5-speed without A/C. I have performer #6037 heads, e-cam, typhoon intake, 70mm t-body, ported stock mass air, stock injectors, 1 5/8" shorty headers, x-pipe, no cats, 40 series flowmasters, and 3.55's. Am I making good power factoring in  my altitude?? (3500 or higher with bad air), the weight of the car was input at 3300lbs for the dyno but true weight with driver is about 3500lbs.Last edited by Blaster; 07-28-2004 at 06:41 PM..  | 
| 
		 | 
	
	
	
		
		
		
		
			 
		
		
		
		
		
		
			
		
		
		
	 | 
| 		
			
			 | 
		#10 | 
| 
			
			
			
			 Registered Member 
			
			
		
			
			
			Join Date: Jul 2004 
				Location: garden city, michigan 
				
				
					Posts: 4
				 
				
				
				
				 | 
	
	
	
		
		
			
			 i gained 12 horse on the motor dyno with a 4 hole super sucker. there have been gains higherm dominator car guys have gained as much as 47 horse, there is an article on their page. 
		
	
		
		
		
		
		
		
			http://www.cfm-tech.com/HVHdominator...dynotest-1.htm http://www.cfm-tech.com/catalog/_ss4...rbs_769168.htm thats the one i have, every combo is different so every one gains diffrent #'s http://www.cfm-tech.com/catalog/_ss4...rbs_769168.htm there it is agin, i tried and it didnt come up when i hit the link. its a 4 hole 1 inch aluminum spacer. they also work with NX express and make their nitrous plates 
				__________________ 
		
		
		
		
		
		
	
	510 horse cast iron headed 306(flywheel horsepower) http://www.prestage.com/member+pages/859.aspx http://members.cardomain.com/306er  | 
| 
		 | 
	
	
	
		
		
		
		
			 
		
		
		
		
		
		
			
		
		
		
	 | 
| 		
			
			 | 
		#11 | |
| 
			
			
			
			 Registered Member 
			
			
		
			
				
			
			
			Join Date: Mar 2003 
				Location: Saint Louis, MO 
				
				
					Posts: 634
				 
				
				
				
				 | 
	
	
	
		
		
			
			 Quote: 
	
 
				__________________ 
		
		
		
		
		
		
	
	Tom (Torque) Moss 88Gt 5spd Vert, FLowmaster Catbacks, stock cam advanced 4° @ 108.5° ICL, NMRA prepped GT40P heads 1.85/1.55 valves and 1.7 rockers, MAC P headers Jet-Hot coated, 97 Exlporer intake (ported lower), TB and injectors. 277RWHP/330RWTQ (SAE). http://www.fastlanecars.com/  | 
|
| 
		 | 
	
	
	
		
		
		
		
			 
		
		
		
		
		
		
			
		
		
		
	 | 
| 		
			
			 | 
		#12 | |
| 
			
			
			
			 Registered Member 
			
			
		
			
				
			
			
			Join Date: Mar 2002 
				Location: Miami, FL 
				
				
					Posts: 54
				 
				
				
				
				 | 
	
	
	
		
		
			
			 Quote: 
	
 
				__________________ 
		
		
		
		
		
		
	
	Nelson 1990 Mustang LX 5.0 http://fiveoh.homestead.com  | 
|
| 
		 | 
	
	
	
		
		
		
		
			 
		
		
		
		
		
		
			
		
		
		
	 | 
| 		
			
			 | 
		#13 | 
| 
			
			
			
			 Registered Member 
			
			
		
			
				
			
			
			Join Date: Sep 2002 
				Location: Boston 
				
				
					Posts: 592
				 
				
				
				
				 | 
	
	
	
		
		
			
			 In all honesty, you really DONT want to be pumping exhaust gasses into your intake. The best thing to do is to plug a hose into the EGR valve's location and dump the egr gasses somewhere else (Like a hose that runs behind the car). This lowers your emissions and doesnt make your intake look gooey black after a while. Just my thoughts. Same for pcv. 
		
	
		
		
		
		
		
		
			
				__________________ 
		
		
		
		
		
		
	
	91 GT Carb conversion, holley 600 double pumper, edelbrock performer intake, FMS "C" drop springs, march 1000 underdrive pullies, crane 1.7 roller rockers, GT-40P headers, bassani x pipe, american thunder catback, FMS 4.56's, msd aL6, trunkmount battery, A/C eliminator kit, 3000 stall tci streetfighter, AOD with transgo kit, A+ servo, 300M hardened lockup shaft, kevlar bands and 28,000 gvw trans cooler, 3 core radiator, 300 lbs stripped with a full interior  | 
| 
		 | 
	
	
	
		
		
		
		
			 
		
		
		
		
		
		
			
		
		
		
	 | 
| 		
			
			 | 
		#14 | 
| 
			
			
			
			 Registered Member 
			
			
		
			
				
			
			
			Join Date: Mar 2002 
				Location: Miami, FL 
				
				
					Posts: 54
				 
				
				
				
				 | 
	
	
	
		
		
			
			 This is probably true for all out performance, but for all around driveability, the EEC is depending on the EGR recirculation for its various calculations.  Many a EGR bypassers have complained of part-throttle driveability issues after bypassing that function. 
		
	
		
		
		
		
		
		
			
				__________________ 
		
		
		
		
		
		
	
	Nelson 1990 Mustang LX 5.0 http://fiveoh.homestead.com  | 
| 
		 | 
	
	
	
		
		
		
		
			 
		
		
		
		
		
		
			
		
		
		
	 | 
| 		
			
			 | 
		#15 | 
| 
			
			
			
			 Registered Member 
			
			
		
			
				
			
			
			Join Date: Oct 1998 
				Location: Rogers, MN 
				
				
					Posts: 2,089
				 
				
				
				
				 | 
	
	
	
		
		
			
			 A problem could occur if you still have the vacuum line hooked to the EGR valve causing it to open and close.  The EGR Valve Position (EVP) sensor will tell the computer that it's opening and the computer will think that exhaust gases are being added to the intake charge and adjust accordingly.  Disconnecting the vacuum hose will keep that from happening.  You'll still get a code for the EGR valve not opening, but it won't turn your check engine light on, although it may cause it to flash periodically.  You shouldn't, however, disconnect the EVP sensor.  Doing that will cause it to be stuck in open loop. 
		
	
		
		
		
		
		
		
			
				__________________ 
		
		
		
		
		
		
	
	351W 89 Mustang GT Convertible  | 
| 
		 | 
	
	
	
		
		
		
		
			 
		
		
		
		
		
		
			
		
		
		
	 | 
| 		
			
			 | 
		#16 | 
| 
			
			
			
			 Registered Member 
			
			
		
			
			
			Join Date: Mar 1999 
				Location: Canada 
				
				
					Posts: 66
				 
				
				
				
				 | 
	
	
	
		
		
			
			 Ok, so now that we have the whole EGR thing analyzed (or maybe a discussion on Global warming might be more useful) and a guarantee that adding a carb spacer to my FUEL INJECTED car will add at least 1000HP, I was wondering if anyone really does know if my cars numbers are where they should be, really though I guess it makes no difference because my EGR coolant lines are hooked up which means (or does it??) that I am adding????or gaining??? at least 200 horsepower right 
		
	
		
		
		
		
		
		
		
		
		
	
	![]()  | 
| 
		 | 
	
	
	
		
		
		
		
			 
		
		
		
		
		
		
			
		
		
		
	 | 
| 		
			
			 | 
		#17 | 
| 
			
			
			
			 Rebel Fleet Commander 
			
			
		
			
				
			
			
			Join Date: Oct 2001 
				Location: Huber Heights,  OH 
				
				
					Posts: 1,003
				 
				
				
				
				 | 
	
	
	
		
		
			
			 I am a big beliver in the spacer.  Made my car more consistantly faster at the track.  Heat in the intake is good for one thing, emissions.  No, you would not see any major gains by itself, but hell, I even run one on my Tauraus!! 
		
	
		
		
		
		
		
		
			
				__________________ 
		
		
		
		
		
		
	
	1993 Mustang GT, PTK w/ T-64 - My Cardomain Webpage 11.25@123.5 on only 8 psi. 10.84@121 on only 1 headgasket ![]() ![]() ![]() "The Truth is, Your the Weak, and I am the Tyranny of Evil Men!"  
			 | 
| 
		 | 
	
	
	
		
		
		
		
			 
		
		
		
		
		
		
			
		
		
		
	 | 
![]()  | 
		
	
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | Rate This Thread | 
		
  | 
	
		
  | 
			 
			Similar Threads
		 | 
	||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post | 
| crank shaft spacers | BilLster | Windsor Power | 0 | 04-24-2003 02:53 PM | 
| Axle from 4 banger work? | 90LxDroptop | Windsor Power | 1 | 04-01-2002 08:54 PM | 
| will a 91 mass air harness work in a 88 gt? | bryan88gt | Windsor Power | 5 | 03-24-2002 12:39 AM | 
| will this work for forced induction? | mikos chris | Windsor Power | 0 | 01-14-2001 03:05 PM | 
| Need some professional advice - head work, valve springs, rockers, cam. pretty long. | AxemanZZ | Windsor Power | 15 | 01-11-2001 01:30 PM | 
                    
                  