94/95 or 96+ spindles? Darius?

Skankin · 05-01-2001, 12:55 PM

There's so much mis-information on the subject, and I know you've had both...

What's the difference, and why did you choose the 96+?

I know the 96+ has a straight steering arm, but if you're using a bumpsteer kit anyway, would the 94/95 do?

Does the 96+ move the wheel out 1/4"?

I just ordered take-off 99-01 GT PBR calipers from stangparts, includes brackets & lines for $99 /pair, great deal! When I get the spindles, I'll just have to grind them a little to clearance the larger twin-piston caliper. But what spindle?

I've got the 99 cobra wheels waiting to go on. I'll do a SN95 rear disk setup, and use a larger bore svo/lincoln MC. I'm considering a manual rack too...

Skankin · 05-01-2001, 01:01 PM

Also, are you removing the spacers under you're cc plates? The strut/spindle mount is lower, so you might find that the fox3 strut isn't long enough at full extension/droop... just something else to check.

97snakedriver · 05-01-2001, 05:21 PM

The 96+ spindles move the hub out 1/2" more then the SN95s.

drudis · 05-02-2001, 08:54 PM

I had the 95 spindles with the M2300K brake s I bought. Then, I wanted to get some brake backing plates to funnel air and _enclose_ (seal) the back of the rotor to this plate to FORCE air THRU the rotor (not just aim air AT the rotor...). That deal fell thru (guy promised a lot and delivered none). Pretty pissed, cause I spent money to get new spindles, and machining all over again, not to get any further.

That in mind, I needed the 96+ spindles cause of the arm position (as you mentioned). Thats it. Not really for any more acherman, or moving outward of 8mm (1/3") more.

------------------
Darius Rudis
Roadracer: Home built t-arm/panhard suspension powered by an S-trimmed motor :-)
My Mustang Page

Skankin · 05-03-2001, 12:50 PM

Thanks for the info...

Are the 96+ arms longer than the 94/95 (for increased ackerman)?

I'm just wondering if they might steer a litle easier with a manual rack...

Skankin · 05-03-2001, 12:51 PM

(refering to the steering arm... maybe not obvious).

05-01-2001, 12:55 PM	#1
Skankin Registered Member Join Date: Dec 1998 Location: London, Ontario, Canada Posts: 1,349	94/95 or 96+ spindles? Darius? There's so much mis-information on the subject, and I know you've had both... What's the difference, and why did you choose the 96+? I know the 96+ has a straight steering arm, but if you're using a bumpsteer kit anyway, would the 94/95 do? Does the 96+ move the wheel out 1/4"? I just ordered take-off 99-01 GT PBR calipers from stangparts, includes brackets & lines for $99 /pair, great deal! When I get the spindles, I'll just have to grind them a little to clearance the larger twin-piston caliper. But what spindle? I've got the 99 cobra wheels waiting to go on. I'll do a SN95 rear disk setup, and use a larger bore svo/lincoln MC. I'm considering a manual rack too...

Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Email this Page
Display Modes	Rate This Thread
Linear Mode Switch to Hybrid Mode Switch to Threaded Mode	Rate This Thread:

Similar Threads
Thread	Thread Starter	Forum	Replies	Last Post
IFS drop spindles on 65-66?	65modified	Classic Mustangs	15	01-29-2007 06:06 AM
Darius is in the new MM&FF mag	302 LX Eric	Blue Oval Lounge	11	04-30-2003 10:32 PM
Happy Birthday to Moderator Darius!!!	StangFlyer	Corner Carvers Delight	10	09-02-2002 07:25 PM
4 cyl. spindles vs. V8 spindles	Coupe Devil	Windsor Power	2	02-11-2002 07:12 PM
94/95 GT vs. 94/95 Cobra Performance	95mustanggt	Blue Oval Lounge	2	03-05-2001 02:45 PM

05-01-2001, 01:01 PM	#2
Skankin Registered Member Join Date: Dec 1998 Location: London, Ontario, Canada Posts: 1,349	Also, are you removing the spacers under you're cc plates? The strut/spindle mount is lower, so you might find that the fox3 strut isn't long enough at full extension/droop... just something else to check.

05-01-2001, 05:21 PM	#3
97snakedriver Registered Member Join Date: May 1999 Location: Blacksburg, VA Posts: 1,526	The 96+ spindles move the hub out 1/2" more then the SN95s.

05-02-2001, 08:54 PM	#4
drudis Moderator Join Date: Dec 1999 Location: Livonia, MI, USA Posts: 1,194	I had the 95 spindles with the M2300K brake s I bought. Then, I wanted to get some brake backing plates to funnel air and _enclose_ (seal) the back of the rotor to this plate to FORCE air THRU the rotor (not just aim air AT the rotor...). That deal fell thru (guy promised a lot and delivered none). Pretty pissed, cause I spent money to get new spindles, and machining all over again, not to get any further. That in mind, I needed the 96+ spindles cause of the arm position (as you mentioned). Thats it. Not really for any more acherman, or moving outward of 8mm (1/3") more. ------------------ Darius Rudis Roadracer: Home built t-arm/panhard suspension powered by an S-trimmed motor :-) My Mustang Page

05-03-2001, 12:50 PM	#5
Skankin Registered Member Join Date: Dec 1998 Location: London, Ontario, Canada Posts: 1,349	Thanks for the info... Are the 96+ arms longer than the 94/95 (for increased ackerman)? I'm just wondering if they might steer a litle easier with a manual rack...

05-03-2001, 12:51 PM	#6
Skankin Registered Member Join Date: Dec 1998 Location: London, Ontario, Canada Posts: 1,349	(refering to the steering arm... maybe not obvious).