 
                    
                  
                    © Copyright 1995 thru 2008 - The Mustang Works™. All Rights Reserved.
MustangWorks.com is designed and hosted by Aero3 Media.
                    
                  
                MustangWorks.com is designed and hosted by Aero3 Media.
|  05-03-2004, 10:21 PM | #1 | 
| Registered Member Join Date: Sep 2000 Location: rock hill,S.C. 29730 
					Posts: 420
				 |  Motor Rebuild Ques. I'm going to rebuild my bottom end and was wondering a few things. 1) Should I have my rotating assembly balanced? I'm on a budget and I am using stock (home ported) heads (stock valves) and intake and my mach. shop charges $190. I may get another intake but prob not heads also Imay spray it w/100 shot. I was thinking balancing or a main girdle?? Either? I am on a pretty tight budget but don't want to sacrifice durability. 2) What cam should I use? My heads are milled .035 and I'd like to keep the 1.7 RR's. Leave stock cam? I like the specs on the trickflow #1 cam (lift with 1.7's would be .530/.542 & 221/225 dur @.050) too much for shaved heads? Any other suggestions, tips greatly appreciated !! Thanks Wes 
				__________________ 88 GT: subs,pullies, 1 3/4 longtubes, flowmasters, AFR 165's,T,F #1 cam,Thyphoon intake, 24# inj., 73mm C&L,65mmT.B., 190LPH pump, Eagle sir rods, forged pistons in a newly rebuilt 306. DYNO TUNED TO 300.97 RWHP 337RWTQ | 
|   |   | 
|  05-04-2004, 08:26 AM | #2 | 
| Registered Member Join Date: Feb 2002 Location: Jacksonville, FL 
					Posts: 706
				 |  hmmm... I'm sure PKRWUD will chime in here, but my .02 anyway. Yes, have your rotating assembly balanced. You can't build up your block with doubts about your crank. I don't think it is really an option. Think about it later after you are done, it may hurt money-wise now, but you can add stuff up top later with confidence that your lower end is sound. Esp if you are going with a power adder. I don't think the stock cam is that bad for what you are doing either. A big bad cam on even ported stock heads and stock intake is probably not the most efficient way of adding power. I'd balance the lower end now, and then do a cam later when I changed heads and intake. 
				__________________ 1988 GT Convertible 331 10:1 TW heads, GT-40 intake, MSD, TRW flattops, B Cam w/ 1.7's, MAC exhaust, 24's, 70 TB, 76 MAF, 3.73's, Pro 5.0, Koni's, Anderson PMS, Wideband 02, yatta, yatta... One week with new motor, two speeding tickets...joy | 
|   |   | 
|  05-04-2004, 09:11 AM | #3 | 
| It's a lot like a race car Join Date: Aug 2000 Location: Meridian, MS 
					Posts: 4,130
				 |   Go ahead and get it balanced now.  It's easier to do it now than later. If I remember correctly the max lift is aroud .555. But that's with stock heads and pistons. I would sell the 1.7 RR and get a set of 1.6's. I would actully probably go with a cam with a TAD less duration than the TFS #1 cam. Whatever you do say away from the FMS alphabet cams (E-303, B-303, etc). They're junk. 
				__________________ 1987 Buick T-type 1998 HD Electra Elide | 
|   |   | 
|  05-04-2004, 09:46 AM | #4 | |
| Registered Member Join Date: Feb 2002 Location: Jacksonville, FL 
					Posts: 706
				 |   Quote: 
 Not trying to flame, but they are still decent cams, not the best, but good drivability cams. 
				__________________ 1988 GT Convertible 331 10:1 TW heads, GT-40 intake, MSD, TRW flattops, B Cam w/ 1.7's, MAC exhaust, 24's, 70 TB, 76 MAF, 3.73's, Pro 5.0, Koni's, Anderson PMS, Wideband 02, yatta, yatta... One week with new motor, two speeding tickets...joy | |
|   |   | 
|  05-04-2004, 12:47 PM | #5 | |
| Guest 
					Posts: n/a
				 |  alphabet cams Quote: 
 | |
|   | 
|  05-04-2004, 12:53 PM | #6 | |
| Guest 
					Posts: n/a
				 |  stock cam Quote: 
 I'd stay with the stock cam. Your heads still have stock sized valves and even if you get an aftermarket intake...you won't benefit from an aftermarket cam. You'd probably lose some low end torque actually. When my motor was stock with all the little bolt- ons...I ran 1.72 rockers and picked up a little top end. Not much...but there was a difference. So my suggestion is to use your 1.7 rockers. If you already have them...you might as well use them. | |
|   | 
|  05-04-2004, 11:50 PM | #7 | 
| It's a lot like a race car Join Date: Aug 2000 Location: Meridian, MS 
					Posts: 4,130
				 |   E-303 = junk.  Idles like crap, falls on it's face in the upper RPMs B-303 = Kinda quarky but a fairly decent cam. It likes carbs F-303 = the best of the alphbet cams, IMHO, if you've got the parts to support it X-303 = Does any body with a serious motor actully run this? Over all most of the alphabet cams are marginal at best. I'd use one if I could pick up a used one for cheap. But I can't see buying a brand new alphabet cam when there are so many choices that are so much better. 
				__________________ 1987 Buick T-type 1998 HD Electra Elide | 
|   |   | 
|  05-05-2004, 10:34 AM | #8 | 
| Guest 
					Posts: n/a
				 |  agreed I totally agree.  My motor only has about 20K miles on it...but I rebuilt the motor some 7 or 8 years ago.  The choices of cams back then weren't what they are today.  Eventually I'll swap in a better cam...when I can afford some AFR 165s.    | 
|   | 
|  05-05-2004, 10:39 PM | #9 | 
| Registered Member Join Date: Dec 1998 Location: NJ 
					Posts: 219
				 |   1. Balance it 2. Stock cam retarded 4* 
				__________________ 347- 10.63@128 N/A | 
|   |   | 
|  05-09-2004, 10:25 AM | #10 | 
| dude5l Join Date: May 2001 Location: Grande Prairie, Alberta, Canada 
					Posts: 603
				 |   Since nobody else mentioned it, I will. Try and do the main girdle as well when you have it apart. Its cheap insurance and there are more than a few 2 piece 302 blocks out there to prove it. And if you are going to a larger cam or 1.7 rockers, check your piston to valve clearance before your final assembly. 
				__________________ Good luck! Brad R. 1992 L.X. 5.0 coupe MODS: A few little bolt ons  New Best time ...11.60 @ 128 mph @ 2000+ ft altitude. Rice Haters Club member #39 Users rides #2542 | 
|   |   | 
|  05-09-2004, 01:01 PM | #11 | 
| Registered Member Join Date: Sep 2000 Location: rock hill,S.C. 29730 
					Posts: 420
				 |   How exactly do you check piston/valve clearance? All I know is what I've read: put some clay on top of piston, mock up head & turn over by hand? If the valve is gonna hit the piston will it not bind up? Can any piston be notched for clearance? Is it expensive to have them notched, how do I check and then translate to machine shop where to notch them?, how deep? Inexpereance sux! Thanks P.S. A while back I ran a desktop dyno of a stock motor and the power really jumped when i retarded the stock cam so I was concidering doing that ,but 4* seems like a lot? I don't have that program any more but it seems I remember that the retarted cam really brought up power anyone else tried this with their car? 
				__________________ 88 GT: subs,pullies, 1 3/4 longtubes, flowmasters, AFR 165's,T,F #1 cam,Thyphoon intake, 24# inj., 73mm C&L,65mmT.B., 190LPH pump, Eagle sir rods, forged pistons in a newly rebuilt 306. DYNO TUNED TO 300.97 RWHP 337RWTQ | 
|   |   | 
|  05-09-2004, 06:44 PM | #12 | |
| Sober voice of Reason Join Date: Nov 1998 Location: Kelowna, B.C., Canada 
					Posts: 1,514
				 |   Quote: 
 Also, don't bother with a girdle, it won't help to stop the block from splitting, all it'll do is act as a seatbelt to save the internals, which is a waste with stock parts. 
				__________________ 393W: AFR 205's, hydraulic roller, TKO600. | |
|   |   | 
|  | 
| 
 | 
 | 
|  Similar Threads | ||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post | 
| 86-93 TB ques 5.0 ques!! | boostedsohc | Windsor Power | 5 | 11-28-2002 12:00 PM | 
| aftermarket hood ques. | girlhound | Windsor Power | 2 | 08-14-2002 08:48 PM | 
| another radiator ques. | saywhenn94 | Windsor Power | 1 | 03-26-2002 06:26 PM | 
| 393ci. ques. | saywhenn94 | Windsor Power | 2 | 03-11-2002 08:08 PM | 
| TBI to Carb/ DUI distributor ques. | LTD LX | Windsor Power | 1 | 03-14-2001 08:17 PM | 
 
                    
                  