 
                    
                  
                    © Copyright 1995 thru 2008 - The Mustang Works™. All Rights Reserved.
MustangWorks.com is designed and hosted by Aero3 Media.
                    
                  
                MustangWorks.com is designed and hosted by Aero3 Media.
|  08-22-2002, 07:18 AM | #14 | 
| Registered Member Join Date: Jul 2002 Location: Maryland 
					Posts: 51
				 |  Octane I always use 93 octane in my 91 5.0 because I was under the impression that it is better for my engine because of all the detergents it contains.  I've run 89 before with no problem, I just usually opt for the 93.  After reading this post particularly what prkwud stated I now think I might actually be doing my engine harm.  Is this right?  Should I use the 89 octane from now on?  I'm not trying to get any horsepower gains from using either one, I just want to use whatever is better for my engine.  I do have my timing slightly advanced, but like I said there is no knocking when I use 89. 
				__________________ '91 MUSTANG LX 5.0. Flowmaster Catback Exhaust, In Fender K&N air intake, timing advancement, high voltage coil, pheonix gold/kicker stereo, pro 5.0 shifter. | 
|   |   | 
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | Rate This Thread | 
| 
 | 
 | 
|  Similar Threads | ||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post | 
| rumors about going faster | Coupe Devil | Windsor Power | 2 | 05-06-2003 09:12 PM | 
| Granada brake swap rumors? | fastsvo | Classic Mustangs | 1 | 01-22-2002 09:55 AM | 
| rumors | 1weirdone | Modular Madness | 1 | 10-02-2001 11:24 AM | 
 
                    
                  