
© Copyright 1995 thru 2008 - The Mustang Works™. All Rights Reserved.
MustangWorks.com is designed and hosted by Aero3 Media.
MustangWorks.com is designed and hosted by Aero3 Media.
|
|
#2 |
|
Registered Member
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Atlanta, GA
Posts: 2,325
|
There will be a lot of people who tell you not to get a v8. I'm not going to be one of them, its not what you asked. Here are some pro's and cons on the two cars.
'95 Pro-Newer -better looking (opinion) -Airbags -Rigidity Cons-Slower -Cast pistions -$$ Insrance AND Purchase '89 Pro-Better base motor -Cheaper -Drop top cruising Cons-Body flex -13 years old -you think its ugly One thing you may notice the more you get into Mustangs, is how that body grows on you. I'm a bigger fan of it now than when it was new. No matter what, get a pushrod motor. Don't get a 96-new car if you want to keep it and make it fast. I'd say go with whatever you can slip past the parents and keep the racing on the track.
__________________
1997 Mustang GT "The Freak" - 13.80 @ 101.70, 2.07 60' 1995 Honda VFR750 - not much @ really fast (actual data pending.) 1964.5 Mustang 289 Rice Haters Club Member #13 |
|
|
|
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Safety Issue 64 - 70 Mustangs | Mach1 Cobra Jet | Classic Mustangs | 20 | 07-11-2005 08:06 PM |
| t-5, is it the same in the 4 cylinder and V8 | ex-lt1-guy | Windsor Power | 12 | 03-03-2002 01:59 AM |
| Jap car vs. Ford car, then driver and friends vs. other driver and friends | SlowStang2 | Stang Stories | 17 | 08-12-2001 02:43 AM |
| 89-Mustang pulling trailer -vs- 2000 Mustang | Five0 | Stang Stories | 7 | 04-01-2001 02:50 AM |
| Salaeen, Shelby, Cobra please define these for me. | Taqus | Blue Oval Lounge | 3 | 01-17-2001 02:39 AM |
