

© Copyright 1995 thru 2008 - The Mustang Works™. All Rights Reserved.
MustangWorks.com is designed and hosted by Aero3 Media.
MustangWorks.com is designed and hosted by Aero3 Media.
![]() |
#11 |
Registered Member
Join Date: May 1999
Posts: 5,246
|
![]() Wow... $30/ea set or $30/ea head? Either way, those things used to be $500/set, minimum.
Port and polish GT-40p Advantage = compression ratio. 59cc combustion chamber vs 65.5cc on the GT-40 Iron.* GT-40p Advantage = low lift camshaft. If we were talking about an XE series camshaft with high lift, it would favor the GT-40 Irons as the Irons do flow a little more at .600 lift. GT-40p Disadvantage = Exhaust valve size. 1.46 vs 1.54. There is only so much air you can squeeze through the smaller valve on the GT-40p heads. GT-40p Disadvantage #2 = Headers. The p heads require special headers so I have to wonder whether or not your exhaust options will be as good once the porting/polishing is all done? *Your compression ratio may get pretty high on the p's. On a stock 69 Mustang with the 351w, you'd be at about 11.0:1 on the GT-40p's and close to 10.1:1 on the GT-40 Irons. I don't know what pistons you're using so that makes it impossible to truly say. Last edited by Unit 5302; 03-08-2010 at 11:38 AM.. |
![]() |
![]() |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
2 types of GT40 iron heads, not talking abou the P | Hethj7 | Windsor Power | 5 | 10-26-2010 09:16 PM |
GT40 Intakes- Explorer? | squid | Windsor Power | 9 | 09-22-2010 03:01 AM |
Whats the difference in GT40 and GT40P Heads? | RoushRacing6N17 | Windsor Power | 2 | 11-17-2003 11:52 PM |
GT40 intake good enough? | 91evilstang | Windsor Power | 8 | 09-02-2001 04:41 PM |
GT40 Intakes | Smokedawg | Windsor Power | 2 | 02-07-2001 10:28 PM |