Threaded Mode
© Copyright 1995 thru 2008 - The Mustang Works™. All Rights Reserved.
MustangWorks.com is designed and hosted by Aero3 Media.
MustangWorks.com is designed and hosted by Aero3 Media.
02-27-2002, 02:03 PM
|
#11 |
|
Dirk Diggler
Join Date: Feb 1999
Location: SLOATSBURG, NY
Posts: 1,931
|
lookie at the pictue closly..id much rather have that intake that the elderbrocks..there is no inside hidden bolt on that
 on that you have to take the end cover off of..notice the 2 bolts on the top of the intake..this look like it is based on the elderbrock thought but improved..and if it is the mac intake then it flows 35 more cfm than the performer(makes sence sence its power range is up to 6500 for a 302)
__________________
95 undecided cubes, AFR 185s,undecided cam, undecided intake, and a 150 hit 89 "turbonotch" 2.3T You might want to hold on..i saw this on a cartoon once |
|
|
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| New Intake with NITROUS!!!???? | NOSstang08690 | Power Adders | 9 | 09-09-2003 07:05 AM |
| intake | ghostfacedriver | Blue Oval Lounge | 1 | 08-26-2003 07:16 AM |
| Head and intake flow. Something to think about. :) | 5ohCOUPE | Windsor Power | 3 | 03-16-2003 08:52 AM |
| OIL IN INTAKE almost sure from 'pcv' | QUIN | Windsor Power | 8 | 03-09-2001 01:58 PM |
| Is the true about Edelbrock heads with TFS intake? | gt93mustang | Windsor Power | 14 | 03-06-2001 07:01 PM |