Threaded Mode
© Copyright 1995 thru 2008 - The Mustang Works™. All Rights Reserved.
MustangWorks.com is designed and hosted by Aero3 Media.
MustangWorks.com is designed and hosted by Aero3 Media.
03-07-2002, 11:12 PM
|
#7 |
|
Junior Member
Join Date: Mar 1999
Location: Ventura, California
Posts: 8,981
|
The 289 is much more than just 13 cubes smaller, IMHO. I would take a 289 for a 1/4 mile engine anyday over a 302. Stroke is where it's at, folks.I can't say that the 289 necessarily has a higher redline, but it reaches it quicker. The 289 heads had smaller combustion chambers, too.
Just my nickel Take care, -Chris
__________________
Webmaster: Rice Haters Club Jim Porter Racing Peckerwoods Pit Stop Support Your Local
RED & WHITE! |
|
|
|
|