
© Copyright 1995 thru 2008 - The Mustang Works™. All Rights Reserved.
MustangWorks.com is designed and hosted by Aero3 Media.
MustangWorks.com is designed and hosted by Aero3 Media.
|
|
#5 |
|
Registered Member
Join Date: Oct 1998
Location: Suburban Chicago, Hanover Park
Posts: 695
|
I went with the 1.6 rockers because i figured if i wanted more lift i would use the cam. Plus I'd heard of people wrecking their springs like fiveohpatrol mentioned. It's a pretty simple install, but you'll need a conversion kit or have your heads machined to accept studs. I've heard they're good for like 25 hp, but I've never seen a dyno sheet or anything to prove it. When I put mine in on my stock heads i noticed a big difference, especially in the higher rpms. If your going to keep the stock heads i'd say go with the 1.7's and upgrade your springs, if you plan on aftermarket heads go with the 1.6's and use a bigger cam to increase lift. Just my .02
__________________
My Ford Club http://www.midwestfords.org/ Best time N/A 12.9 @ 107 1.711 60' 125 shot - 12.04 @ 113 1.59 60' |
|
|
|
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Roller Rockers for my AFR's.....and install questions | dragstang86 | Windsor Power | 4 | 12-31-2002 08:18 PM |
| Roller Tip Rockers | sleeperstang | Classic Mustangs | 2 | 11-12-2002 08:52 AM |
| What cam and rockers would work with this combo? | 95 King GT | Windsor Power | 2 | 10-10-2001 11:32 AM |
| Roller rockers hitting valve covers like crazy. | FastGTragtop | Windsor Power | 4 | 07-27-2001 12:09 AM |
| Need some professional advice - head work, valve springs, rockers, cam. pretty long. | AxemanZZ | Windsor Power | 15 | 01-11-2001 01:30 PM |
