

© Copyright 1995 thru 2008 - The Mustang Works™. All Rights Reserved.
MustangWorks.com is designed and hosted by Aero3 Media.
MustangWorks.com is designed and hosted by Aero3 Media.
![]() |
#1 |
Dirk Diggler
Join Date: Feb 1999
Location: SLOATSBURG, NY
Posts: 1,931
|
![]() ok i am almost done building my newmotor..i basically have left to buy is carb and intake..i was going with the victor jr intake but now i see this new RPM airgap intake and i like it..in the article in 5.0 they say that this intake will be faster on most motors(unless built for real high rpms) as in the motor with the same combo just diffrent intakes the RPM airgap will walk the vic jr and the vic jr probally wont be able to catch up..here is my combo you tell me..i am leaning towards the RPM airgap..whatcha think
dss 306, 10.1:1, AFR 185(58cc), XE274HR(.555/.565, 224/236), 650 Deamon, 4.10s, dynamic c-4 w/ 4kstall, and a big blue bottle in the near future..all this will be in a 93+ Ranger set up for drag(2200-2500lbs) thanks in advanced..rember dyno #'s dont impress me..1/4 times do!
__________________
95 undecided cubes, AFR 185s,undecided cam, undecided intake, and a 150 hit 89 "turbonotch" 2.3T You might want to hold on..i saw this on a cartoon once |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Never Forget... | Hammer | Blue Oval Lounge | 1 | 05-26-2003 10:50 PM |
Trying to get the car to be faster on the motor! | NOSstang08690 | Modular Madness | 6 | 03-24-2002 04:01 PM |
Mustang Dynos are inaccurate?!? | turbolx | Stang Stories | 7 | 08-21-2001 10:32 PM |
Whats faster? | blue95sho | Windsor Power | 10 | 06-23-2001 12:59 PM |
Are '98 GTs any faster than '96-'97s? | Daniel MItchell | Modular Madness | 6 | 03-29-2000 03:20 PM |