

© Copyright 1995 thru 2008 - The Mustang Works™. All Rights Reserved.
MustangWorks.com is designed and hosted by Aero3 Media.
MustangWorks.com is designed and hosted by Aero3 Media.
![]() |
#6 |
Registered Member
Join Date: Nov 1998
Location: Houston, Tx.
Posts: 3,887
|
![]() I was going purely on memory, maybe from some long lost source. I looked it up in my book MUSTANG by Randy Leffingwell. He says 15.9 @89 for the '65 K code 289 Hipo. There is lots of disparity though in magazine tests (some of the drivers suck badly). Remember these were using skinny, bias ply tires.
Rev
__________________
'66 Coupe, 306, 350-375 HP, C-4, 13.07 e.t., 104.8 mph, 1/4 mi. O.B.C. #2 '66 coupe |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
new to fast mustangs but not fast cars...I've a few ?'s | XGN | Windsor Power | 3 | 07-03-2002 09:40 AM |
Are these fast?? | Dark_5.0 | Stang Stories | 13 | 05-16-2002 01:19 PM |
Super cars and Fast and the Furious | #1 Pony | Blue Oval Lounge | 9 | 01-29-2002 12:54 AM |
289's compared GT-40P's??? | Coolbreeze | Windsor Power | 8 | 09-13-2001 12:10 AM |
Pesky Supra, actually thought he had a fast car. | Unit 5302 | Stang Stories | 7 | 03-20-2001 01:34 PM |