

© Copyright 1995 thru 2008 - The Mustang Works™. All Rights Reserved.
MustangWorks.com is designed and hosted by Aero3 Media.
MustangWorks.com is designed and hosted by Aero3 Media.
![]() |
#35 | |
Registered Member
Join Date: May 1999
Posts: 5,246
|
![]() Quote:
I'd also like to know how leaving the stock cam in place, and adding 1.7:1 RR will outperform the B-303. HO Cam w/1.7s (estmated @.050, and lift) .472"/.472" 206*/206*@.050 266*/266* LSA 116 LCA 116. B-303 .480"/.480" 224*/224*@.050 284*/284* LSA 112 LCA 109/119 The B-303 has a serious edge in higher rpm power due to increased duration, and a drop in LSA. It even manages more lift, and your valvetrain geometry stays better with the 1.6:1 rockers. Your comment about cams not causing surging is incorrect as well. They WILL cause the stock computer problems if they don't generate enough vacuum or are inconsistant in vacuum production. The list of people who've had idle problems with the E-303 is about a mile long. I'd say your odds are about 1 in 3 you'll have problems with the E cam. I'm not playing sides here people. I'm playing facts. |
|
![]() |
|
|