Threaded Mode
© Copyright 1995 thru 2008 - The Mustang Works™. All Rights Reserved.
MustangWorks.com is designed and hosted by Aero3 Media.
MustangWorks.com is designed and hosted by Aero3 Media.
11-07-2002, 10:47 AM
|
#6 |
|
Registered Member
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: Olney, Illinois, USA
Posts: 212
|
Thanks Guys.
SO are you saying at like 180 MPH an dgoing up its a huge factor of aerodynamics? I really dont understadn the frontal area thing coudl you explain that again? I know mustangs are bricks but lets say compared to a vette that has 450 RWHP and goes 201 MPH. If I was to use a mustang platform how much RWHP woudl i actually need? 600? I mean honestly i knwo there are cars superior in certain aspects to the msutang. But its not a mustang. Does weight play much a factor into top speed? Actaully i plan to slightly lower my gears jsut a tad to maybe 3.08's but allow hte engine to rev around 7,000 or shouls i stick with my 2.73's or around there?
__________________
!988 GT World Windsor Sr.'s, Harland sharpe rockers, 3.73 gears, pulleys, no ac, hurst shifter, 10:1 pistons, BBK full length headers and H-pipe with flows. Under extensive work for porting and fly cutting to accept my new cam and to match my soon to have systemax intake *DROOL* Best E.T. 13.20 with edelbrock RPM intake and 70mm TB |
|
|
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Toploader 4 speed VS FMX auto | Metal396 | Classic Mustangs | 6 | 03-16-2003 10:00 AM |
| Speed Secret # 3 | jim_howard_pdx | Windsor Power | 13 | 11-09-2002 10:35 AM |
| Please Comment of Speed Secret # 2 | jim_howard_pdx | Windsor Power | 20 | 11-06-2002 11:44 AM |
| First ticket. Sucks, sucks bad. | zepherman | Blue Oval Lounge | 46 | 12-16-2001 07:24 PM |
| 3 speed Manual to a 3 speed Auto in a 66 | T-N-T | Classic Mustangs | 0 | 08-04-1999 08:45 AM |