

© Copyright 1995 thru 2008 - The Mustang Works™. All Rights Reserved.
MustangWorks.com is designed and hosted by Aero3 Media.
MustangWorks.com is designed and hosted by Aero3 Media.
![]() |
#3 |
gear banger
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: CHICAGO
Posts: 1,144
|
![]() Stroker all the way!!! The bigger the better. I would stay away from the dual plan intakes with the extra cubes though. And i would never get a off the shelf cam for a engine that was not stock. Just my .02
Wade
__________________
79 Hatch: NA 347, Stage 2 Canfield Heads, Victor JR. Intake, Blueprinted Holley 750 HP, Solid Roller Cam, Shooting for 10's on motor 93 LX: Tremec, dual friction clutch, fms flywheel, Hedman shorties, O/R H-pipe Ricer hater's club member #49 |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Building a stroker motor | Mustang_289 | Windsor Power | 4 | 02-17-2005 12:46 PM |
Blown Stroker Computer Help | RabidPony | Modular Madness | 10 | 02-07-2004 11:56 PM |
'super' stroker vs 'budget' stroker | mike5p01 | Windsor Power | 4 | 10-11-2003 10:11 PM |
351w or 347 stroker? which is better? | BLACK85GT | Windsor Power | 55 | 12-21-2002 06:52 PM |
Decided to build a stroker, but where do I start? | WhiteLX | Windsor Power | 5 | 12-16-2002 10:35 AM |