Threaded Mode
© Copyright 1995 thru 2008 - The Mustang Works™. All Rights Reserved.
MustangWorks.com is designed and hosted by Aero3 Media.
MustangWorks.com is designed and hosted by Aero3 Media.
03-08-2004, 11:50 AM
|
#6 |
|
Registered Member
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: WI
Posts: 22
|
On a mild 302 combo, the longer runner edelbrock usually is a better choice. I've had 3 edelbrock intakes, and the quailty is worth the added money IMO. I use an RPM now, but I have a polished performer upper which looks better than the Typhoon IMO.
__________________
93 GT-11.8@116 |
|
|
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Typhoon Intake vs Edelbrock Performer RPM | lucheski | Windsor Power | 1 | 07-13-2004 12:54 PM |
| Edelbrock RPM Package | jim_howard_pdx | Classic Mustangs | 2 | 10-28-2002 04:57 PM |
| Experience with Edelbrock RPM Package | jim_howard_pdx | Windsor Power | 0 | 10-27-2002 01:10 AM |
| Edelbrock garbage | Stang951 | Windsor Power | 8 | 06-16-2001 08:21 AM |
| Is the true about Edelbrock heads with TFS intake? | gt93mustang | Windsor Power | 14 | 03-06-2001 07:01 PM |