MustangWorks.com - The Ford Mustang Power Source!

Go Back   MustangWorks.com : Ford Forums > Mustang & Ford Tech > Windsor Power
Register FAQ Members List Calendar

Notices


 
 
Thread Tools Rate Thread Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
Old 06-22-2005, 09:48 PM   #3
Redge
Registered Member
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Montreal
Posts: 8
Default Re: Edelbroock RPM head on a 393

So i'd be better with the Air Gap RPM intake if i want to get a better torque/power curve. It's right on the RPM range i wanted. The Air gap on my 302 was perfect with those head.

Do i need to change the edelbrook valve spings and convert to stud type roller rocker if i want change for a bigger cam or can i keep the pedestal mount 1.6 roller rocker i have on my 302.

I have a goal of 450Hp and 450 Ft-lbs Torque and low 11sec at track. I will need better Transmision with that kind of power .
Redge is offline   Reply With Quote
 



Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Head Gasket tarmon8r Windsor Power 1 04-15-2005 07:15 PM
GM Engines BLOCKER Blue Oval Lounge 2 04-13-2004 12:35 AM
Speed Secret # 3 jim_howard_pdx Windsor Power 13 11-09-2002 10:35 AM
Experience with Edelbrock RPM Package jim_howard_pdx Windsor Power 0 10-27-2002 01:10 AM
what head ? faststang90 Windsor Power 3 09-08-2002 07:17 PM


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:37 PM.


SEARCH