

© Copyright 1995 thru 2008 - The Mustang Works™. All Rights Reserved.
MustangWorks.com is designed and hosted by Aero3 Media.
MustangWorks.com is designed and hosted by Aero3 Media.
![]() |
#7 |
Registered Member
Join Date: Sep 1998
Location: Oviedo, FL
Posts: 992
|
![]() The 302 would be a little easier and cheaper then a 351 swap. The roller 302 has a bunch more speed parts available for it. The efi swap would be a great addition, BUT, you'll need the wiring harnesses, ECU, sensors, etc from a donar car to complete the swap. You'll also have to add a high pressure fuel pump to supply the injectors. Don't think I'm raining on your parade if you want the efi. It is just that a carb instead of efi would be much easier and cheaper.
It you want the extra power the 351 is the way to go. It would be a little more $$$ then a straight 302 [carb. to carb] swap, but not as expensive as a efi swap. I personally like the idea of having 49 extra cubic inches with the 351 swap. You'd have to stroke the 302 to 347 to get the equivalent. Plus, everything else would bolt practically bolt in. Tough call on your behalf....depends on you now. Happy New Year !!!!
__________________
"Support our Troops" Dave 1968 Cougar 2004 Thunderbird 2007 F150 Harley-Davidson, SuperCrew 1986 LTD 1997 Ranger 1992 Honda Civic |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
engine doesn't fit | da89cup | Windsor Power | 5 | 09-28-2006 12:51 AM |
351 w swap | 93svt | Windsor Power | 11 | 09-24-2006 09:20 AM |
LOTS of 351w swap problums!! | DemonGT | Windsor Power | 7 | 09-18-2003 11:15 AM |
NEED HELP ASAP !351W to 351C Swap | IeatZ28 | Classic Mustangs | 2 | 11-06-2001 12:45 AM |
289 to 351W swap in '65 | Len351 | Classic Mustangs | 3 | 02-11-2000 08:39 PM |