Threaded Mode
© Copyright 1995 thru 2008 - The Mustang Works™. All Rights Reserved.
MustangWorks.com is designed and hosted by Aero3 Media.
MustangWorks.com is designed and hosted by Aero3 Media.
03-17-2000, 10:15 AM
|
#2 |
|
Registered Member
Join Date: Oct 1998
Location: Az
Posts: 854
|
well, I'd change the gears.. even for normal driving... with a stock converter, you will not be happy with the was it accelerates..and the gears will help the mileage.. less throttle to get going.. smaller cam would be better too, give more bottom end torque..
------------------ 84 convt,'95 302, performer 3.55's, underdrives shorties 14.49@94,2.03 60ft and a '68 stang that WAS nasty ;-) MY ride MY ride2 |
|
|
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| 1968 engine numbers, 289 or 302? | andybud | Classic Mustangs | 5 | 09-11-2003 12:14 PM |
| raced a Supra Twin Turbo | Stang35th | Stang Stories | 63 | 08-23-2003 12:36 AM |
| new engine | Torinalth | Modular Madness | 4 | 07-15-2002 09:45 AM |
| Will the 5.0 become obsolete | vetteeatr | Blue Oval Lounge | 36 | 07-11-2002 08:39 PM |
| Very bad experience with Engine Dynamics of San Jose CA | JAGraff | Racer's Club House | 0 | 05-12-1999 02:27 AM |