Threaded Mode
© Copyright 1995 thru 2008 - The Mustang Works™. All Rights Reserved.
MustangWorks.com is designed and hosted by Aero3 Media.
MustangWorks.com is designed and hosted by Aero3 Media.
02-19-2001, 08:23 AM
|
#11 |
|
Registered Member
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: Conn.
Posts: 220
|
Still seems strange that an 8" with (pick a ratio) would feel substantually different than a 9" with the same ratio, in the same car. Almost seems that there is some other problem going on here.
------------------ 1965 K code coupe - numbers matching - restoration ongoing. 1987 LX notch, stock heads and intake, 3.55's and typical bolt on's 13.89@100.25 |
|
|
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| 9 inch rear for 66 | patman | Classic Mustangs | 3 | 08-04-2005 10:14 PM |
| identifying rear ends | fordkid68 | Classic Mustangs | 8 | 07-26-2002 06:21 PM |
| 9 inch rear | GTSteed89 | Windsor Power | 1 | 01-25-2002 01:46 PM |
| rear ends | mustangman65_79 | Windsor Power | 4 | 11-24-2001 06:56 AM |
| How good are the 8.8 rear ends? | K.C. 5.0 | Windsor Power | 3 | 08-01-2001 06:35 PM |