

© Copyright 1995 thru 2008 - The Mustang Works™. All Rights Reserved.
MustangWorks.com is designed and hosted by Aero3 Media.
MustangWorks.com is designed and hosted by Aero3 Media.
![]() |
#7 |
Registered Member
Join Date: Dec 1998
Location: Torrance, California, USA
Posts: 104
|
![]() No, a solid lifter was not used for this test. And yes, you ar correct about the solid being a more exact measurment tool. We elected not to use the solid lifter during '99 inspections because we didn't notify racers in advance, in the Rulebook about it. This has been rectified in the new Rulebook. This cam lift test was done like all of the other lifter/cam checks this year, with the lifter completely collapsed. This will be pretty close as a measurement tool. In the several cam lift checks done this year, all have been done in this way. Next year, we will use our solid lifter for these tests.
|
![]() |
![]() |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
stock GT40 head intake runner opening | mak375 | Windsor Power | 2 | 04-07-2003 09:14 PM |
GT40P's with a stock intake? | Agent_4573 | Windsor Power | 3 | 09-15-2002 09:05 PM |
Questions about hoses connected to stock intake | zepherman | Windsor Power | 14 | 09-13-2002 05:05 AM |
HP Question on Combo Cam, upper, lower intake. Work starts Monday | 89FHPLX | Windsor Power | 7 | 01-08-2002 01:42 AM |
Trophy stock question | mustang_500hp | Racer's Club House | 2 | 08-30-1999 09:03 PM |