

© Copyright 1995 thru 2008 - The Mustang Works™. All Rights Reserved.
MustangWorks.com is designed and hosted by Aero3 Media.
MustangWorks.com is designed and hosted by Aero3 Media.
![]() |
#8 |
Registered Member
Join Date: May 1999
Posts: 5,246
|
![]() Is there a displacement clause in there, or just a power/torque band requirement?
I would like to restart the arguement. Is the Mustang V-8 a musclecar? Here is what I would argue. 1964-1966, No. 1967-1973, Yes, only hipo engines exceeding 302ci. 1974-1978, No. 1979-1984, No. 1985-1986, Only 4bbl/SEFI GT 1987-1993, LX and GT 5.0, exc vert. 1994+ No. My mood fluctuates. I would say any 1987-1993 Fox 5.0 with the T-5, exc. the verts are. I actually thought about making the Cobra II and King Cobra musclecars. For their era, they most certainly were. Why? Cause they are just plain brutes. They don't ride good, they have excellent low end power, really quite brutish, even for their years. That's what makes them so fun! ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Safety Issue 64 - 70 Mustangs | Mach1 Cobra Jet | Classic Mustangs | 20 | 07-11-2005 08:06 PM |
South Florida Ford VS Chevy Dyno Day!! | SpeedInjected | Ford Show & Go | 0 | 11-08-2003 12:47 AM |
South Florida Ford VS Chevy Dyno Day!! | SpeedInjected | Blue Oval Lounge | 0 | 11-08-2003 12:41 AM |
Lets do a ford vs chevy meet/cruise to carlsbad on sept. 14th | 46stang | Ford Show & Go | 10 | 08-12-2002 11:43 PM |
Ford questions from a Chevy guy | MuscleCarFanatic | Classic Mustangs | 5 | 06-04-2001 03:24 AM |