data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/27682/2768245b3f9b07af6e70fb59437202ca9daaa005" alt="SEARCH"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/ad222/ad222c4605b442ab30268db2adcfc0671c94ce49" alt="The Mustang Works"
© Copyright 1995 thru 2008 - The Mustang Works™. All Rights Reserved.
MustangWorks.com is designed and hosted by Aero3 Media.
MustangWorks.com is designed and hosted by Aero3 Media.
![]() |
#1 |
It's a lot like a race car
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: Meridian, MS
Posts: 4,130
|
![]() I can't decide which to swap in a turbocharger 2.3 liter or a 5.0 liter. Which do you guys think would be better/cheaper. I'm worried about swaping in the eletronics from the 2.3 turbo(I HATE running wires). Much of the wiring hassel could be elinated if I went with a carbed 5.0 liter. But some one told me that swaping in a 2.3 turbo would be cheaper. Also I've heard that the front syspention is different on a 4 banger than on a V-8(bigger brakes and fatter sway bars). Is this true?
------------------ THE SLO PONY 1992 Ford Mustand LX. 2.3 liter four-banger, auto. Future mods: V-8 swap. If it ain't broke, you ain't tryin hard enough |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Very bad experience with Engine Dynamics of San Jose CA | JAGraff | Classic Mustangs | 8 | 06-16-2005 11:43 AM |
Engine transplant across decades and models. | Sketch | Classic Mustangs | 6 | 04-18-2004 07:51 AM |
Turbo vs SC Sounds like good advice | mustardjohn | Small Ponies | 0 | 11-16-2003 05:21 PM |
Rebuilding an engine.. and then some | Halz | Windsor Power | 5 | 04-01-2002 02:01 AM |
pulled engine....pulled out wallet....a true story! | 84LX89GT | Windsor Power | 6 | 03-13-2002 03:04 PM |