

© Copyright 1995 thru 2008 - The Mustang Works™. All Rights Reserved.
MustangWorks.com is designed and hosted by Aero3 Media.
MustangWorks.com is designed and hosted by Aero3 Media.
![]() |
#2 |
Registered Member
Join Date: May 1999
Posts: 5,246
|
![]() The Turbo 2.3L is good for 175hp in 1987-1988 Thunderbird TC's and the Merkur XR4Ti. The Mustang SVO version got 205hp.
Modifications to the turbo setup are possible, but to get more than about 240hp, you'll need to do some turbo upgrading, or go to nitrous. I don't know as I'd want to run the stock T-5 4banger beyond that, and the rear end starts to become a little iffy as well. Don't expect to get away without making cooling system mods for the turbo engine either. They kick out a ton of heat, and the intercoolers in there add to the need for cooling. The 5.0L everybody knows about. Expect to make a couple more changes with the 5.0L, but not many. Before anybody babbles about reliability, the turbo 2.3L is built to take serious abuse. Forged crank, rods, pistons. |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Very bad experience with Engine Dynamics of San Jose CA | JAGraff | Classic Mustangs | 8 | 06-16-2005 11:43 AM |
Engine transplant across decades and models. | Sketch | Classic Mustangs | 6 | 04-18-2004 07:51 AM |
Turbo vs SC Sounds like good advice | mustardjohn | Small Ponies | 0 | 11-16-2003 05:21 PM |
Rebuilding an engine.. and then some | Halz | Windsor Power | 5 | 04-01-2002 02:01 AM |
pulled engine....pulled out wallet....a true story! | 84LX89GT | Windsor Power | 6 | 03-13-2002 03:04 PM |