MustangWorks.com - The Ford Mustang Power Source!

Go Back   MustangWorks.com : Ford Forums > Mustang & Ford Tech > Windsor Power
Register FAQ Members List Calendar

Notices


 
 
Thread Tools Rate Thread Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
Old 03-08-2001, 08:35 PM   #21
MiracleMax
Registered Member
 
Join Date: Apr 1999
Location: Hayes, Va, USA
Posts: 798
Post

Quote:
Originally posted by NO SLO PK:
Regarding that "legendary 454", it BETTER be making some decent torque...after all, it's got 454 cubes for crying out loud. What it lacks in rod ratio it makes up for in size.
Just illustrating a point , the 347 gets a bad rap for a short R/S ratio and I just wanted to show an engine that was considered highly successful and one that had a shorter R/S than the 347 with a 5.4" rod. I think that BOP 455's had even crappier R/S ratios? but were pretty successful as perfromance engines.
MiracleMax is offline   Reply With Quote
 



Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:38 AM.


SEARCH