Threaded Mode
© Copyright 1995 thru 2008 - The Mustang Works™. All Rights Reserved.
MustangWorks.com is designed and hosted by Aero3 Media.
MustangWorks.com is designed and hosted by Aero3 Media.
12-11-2001, 08:21 AM
|
#2 |
|
Junior Member
Join Date: Mar 1999
Location: Ventura, California
Posts: 8,981
|
The Performer 302 would also require the non-EGR spacer plate (#8714). The Performer 289 would not. The Perf. 302 has a water crossover at it's rear with two extra tapped holes. I don't believe the Perf. 289 has a rear water crossover, and if it does, I know it doesn't have any tapped holes in it. I would just get an RPM manifold. The combined height of the perf. 302 and the spacer plate are almost as high as the RPM, but with one more gasket to leak. The 289 intake would work too. My recommedations would be:
1) Performer RPM 2) Performer 289 3) Performer 302 & spacer Take care, -Chris
__________________
Webmaster: Rice Haters Club Jim Porter Racing Peckerwoods Pit Stop Support Your Local
RED & WHITE! |
|
|
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| 351W crankcase evacuation | jse9 | Windsor Power | 19 | 09-03-2004 12:00 AM |
| Leaking Intake Manifold??? | orlowted | Classic Mustangs | 5 | 05-21-2004 06:19 PM |
| HEGO orange wire grounds to manifold?? | Simi Stang | Windsor Power | 2 | 12-19-2003 08:13 AM |
| Intake Manifold from 289 fit on 351W? | kirkdickinson | Windsor Power | 9 | 09-27-2003 04:50 AM |
| Intake Manifold Swap | 98gt5sp | Modular Madness | 1 | 09-03-2002 07:11 AM |