MustangWorks.com - The Ford Mustang Power Source!

Go Back   MustangWorks.com : Ford Forums > Mustang & Ford Tech > Windsor Power
Register FAQ Members List Calendar Mark Forums Read

Notices


 
 
Thread Tools Rate Thread Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
Old 03-23-2001, 11:15 AM   #31
jimberg
Registered Member
 
jimberg's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 1998
Location: Rogers, MN
Posts: 2,089
Post

Rick91GT is correct about the 1.7s. You should go with a camshaft that has the lift you desire. 1.7s are a bandaid so that you can get more lift out of a cam without having to replace it.

The 351 TFS intake, however, is the correct intake to go with. The runners are shorter, but you want that when you have more displacement. Shorter runners give up some torque in favor of more horsepower. You can afford to do that. I have a GT-40 intake now, and I wish I had the TFS intake. I'll probably get one next year or if I see a deal on one.

------------------
351W 89 Mustang GT Convertible
jimberg is offline   Reply With Quote
 


Thread Tools
Display Modes Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
4.10s? vs. 3.73s? 89fast5oh Windsor Power 3 12-01-2003 07:39 AM
97 Snake: 3.55's or 3.73's? 00'BlackSteed Modular Madness 10 06-03-2001 12:32 PM
4.10's vs 3.73's joey50gt Windsor Power 17 04-13-2001 04:29 PM
3.55's or 4.10's? 93GTDIN Windsor Power 17 02-23-2001 09:08 PM
3.55's or 3.73's? BowTie Eater 5 Liter Windsor Power 3 01-29-2001 03:19 AM


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:07 PM.


SEARCH