

© Copyright 1995 thru 2008 - The Mustang Works™. All Rights Reserved.
MustangWorks.com is designed and hosted by Aero3 Media.
MustangWorks.com is designed and hosted by Aero3 Media.
|
![]() |
#1 |
Moderator
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Myrtle Beach SC
Posts: 1,643
|
![]() I dont think the flow numbers are the same but I am not sure. On the Air gap intake the runners are a little longer. Creating a larger torque curve. This means that the engine will lose a little low end torque but not much. It is a better intake for high turning applications in my opinion.
Brad
__________________
1990 GT, 347, TFS TW Heads, TFS Cam, TFS Track heat, Twin turbos, FMIC, T5. Built Ford Tough Moderator |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
GM Engines | BLOCKER | Blue Oval Lounge | 2 | 04-13-2004 12:35 AM |
Performer RPM | -RootS- | Windsor Power | 4 | 04-25-2003 06:24 PM |
Speed Secret # 3 | jim_howard_pdx | Windsor Power | 13 | 11-09-2002 10:35 AM |
PERFORMER RPM OR GT 40 | 5ohCOUPE | Windsor Power | 3 | 09-23-2001 09:22 PM |
Performer VS. Performer RPM | IMPULSERACING | Windsor Power | 8 | 02-09-2001 12:45 PM |