

© Copyright 1995 thru 2008 - The Mustang Works™. All Rights Reserved.
MustangWorks.com is designed and hosted by Aero3 Media.
MustangWorks.com is designed and hosted by Aero3 Media.
|
![]() |
#1 |
Registered Member
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: Norman, Oklahoma, USA
Posts: 597
|
![]() Thanks, I'll have to find an old stock lower and measure it to see if the GT40 is bigger, thanks a bunch man.
------------------ Michael Black Quantum Motorsports Norman, Oklahoma 1988 Merc Cougar 5.0 HO, Ported and Polished E7TEs, 2.25" duals w/ 2 chamber flowmasters, T5 tranny New E/T!!! 14.626 @ 94.94mph, 2.194 60' time, a little better than last time. Keep in mind this thang is heavy (3590lbs) Finally 14s!!!! |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
GT40 Intakes- Explorer? | squid | Windsor Power | 9 | 09-22-2010 03:01 AM |
GT40 vs Stock lower intake difference | ca_mustang | Windsor Power | 3 | 03-02-2004 05:03 PM |
351W GT40 Lower intake needed.. | mardyn | Windsor Power | 0 | 01-15-2004 07:03 PM |
To port or not to port | Scrapla | Windsor Power | 1 | 02-26-2003 08:59 PM |
GT40 Intakes | Smokedawg | Windsor Power | 2 | 02-07-2001 10:28 PM |