Hybrid Mode
© Copyright 1995 thru 2008 - The Mustang Works™. All Rights Reserved.
MustangWorks.com is designed and hosted by Aero3 Media.
MustangWorks.com is designed and hosted by Aero3 Media.
|
|
01-11-2002, 06:30 AM
|
#1 |
|
Registered Member
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: NY
Posts: 299
|
a friend of mine told me thyere is no difference between the geometry of the 95 control arm and the 79-93. the only difference is the length of the ball joint shank. but, the tapered area is the same size, and therfore it will work. the only thing is thaty the cotter pin will be a few threads higher than the castle nut, where in the original it was right up against it. should the bolt ever work it's way loose, the cotterpin will still hold it together.
__________________
I'm a glutton for punishment. |
|
|
 |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Throttlebody and Intake Plenum Upgrade Question | SleeperGT | Power Adders | 2 | 11-14-2003 09:02 AM |
| clutch and flywheel upgrade | roundeye82 | Modular Madness | 2 | 07-22-2003 09:54 PM |
| 87-93 GT 3rd Brakelight: Bulb part # | ponyboy25 | Windsor Power | 5 | 04-13-2003 08:48 PM |
| NEED ADVISE-Which Upgrade should I do first? | jpumpkinn | Windsor Power | 3 | 11-27-2001 12:51 AM |
| When is it time to upgrade the ignition? | 92Rustang | Windsor Power | 5 | 09-16-2001 01:06 AM |