Mustang Not A Muscle Car

[7000rpmisheaven]

I peeked at one of the other threads. This is what I found

"hey this is Justinah i was checking to see if anyone is up to race me? i have a 2002 Acura RSX w/ NOS and a rear wing spoiler....and i also have $350 to the winner..."

I've got an RSX with NOS! Well I did my homework(what do I know about Acura's) and there is an "S" version of the RSX that has 200hp even with 100 shot I'm not impressed. For some reason though he thinks he's the fastest thing on the road.

And the rear spoiler. He writes it in his post like it makes his car so much better. Somebody please correct me, but it seems that there is no reason for a spoiler to push down on the back when you need the traction up front. Wouldn't they be better off mounting those things on the hood(thats a funny thought isn't it).

A Mustang not a muscle car? Why is a Camaro a muscle car and not a Mustang? He said a 'cuda' or a 'nova.' Isn't the mustang much lighter than both of those anyways.