Hybrid Mode
© Copyright 1995 thru 2008 - The Mustang Works™. All Rights Reserved.
MustangWorks.com is designed and hosted by Aero3 Media.
MustangWorks.com is designed and hosted by Aero3 Media.
|
|
04-12-2001, 06:21 PM
|
#1 |
|
Registered Member
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: Fresno,CA. USA
Posts: 384
|
you are right in saying the % of gear change is more, but the reason (my opinion, which doesn't mean much) that there would be a bigger improvement going from 3.73-4.10 than 2.73-3.08 is because neither of the 2.73-3.08's are putting you in a good power band anyway. 3.73's are getting you close...4.10's are dropping you right in it...about 3 grand at the beginning of each gear....and through the traps at about 5500-5700.
Much more time in your power band will give you much more improvement in ET and MPH..... But that's what i think.................... ------------------ 4.10's,long tubes & 75 shot...Goes 12.50's Check it out at http://www.burnouts.webprovider.com |
|
|
 |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| 4.10s? vs. 3.73s? | 89fast5oh | Windsor Power | 3 | 12-01-2003 07:39 AM |
| 3.73's or 4.10 for a Supercharger? | wantapony2001 | Modular Madness | 5 | 12-18-2002 01:02 AM |
| First Race with 3.73's | 95mustanggt | Stang Stories | 10 | 01-31-2002 02:16 AM |
| 3.73's or 4.10's??? | HiFlow5 0 | Windsor Power | 10 | 09-22-2001 12:21 PM |
| 3.55's, 3.73's Or 4.10's??? | BowTie Eater 5 Liter | Windsor Power | 43 | 03-26-2001 09:41 PM |