
© Copyright 1995 thru 2008 - The Mustang Works™. All Rights Reserved.
MustangWorks.com is designed and hosted by Aero3 Media.
MustangWorks.com is designed and hosted by Aero3 Media.
|
|
#3 |
|
Registered Member
Join Date: Dec 1998
Location: London, Ontario, Canada
Posts: 1,349
|
The front subframe doesn't look much stronger than the floorpan... I'd go for the full length, and tie the suspension pick-ups together.
I've got the Western Motorsports SFC's. Griggs, Global West, Maximum Motorsports & Kenny Brown all have decent SFC's. I wouldn't bother with the ladder/matrix bracing though... it looks like a lot of added weight, for little benefit. If you think you need it, you should go for a roll bar (that'll really add to the torsional rigidity). Some of the 4 pts aren't that intrusive, but a 6 pt would certainly be better. Kenny Brown's RB doesn't look like it'd get in the way... it's thinner & lighter, but doesn't cut it for some of the faster NHRA rules. For street/autocross, it looks pretty good. |
|
|
|
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Subframe connectors, full length vs. standard | flyin 5.8 | Windsor Power | 2 | 10-01-2002 09:41 AM |
| Full length or shorties? | Nicodemus | Small Ponies | 5 | 08-04-2002 10:55 AM |
| MM subframes....standard or full length? | DemonGT | Windsor Power | 3 | 04-22-2002 09:38 AM |
| A bottom-line questioning topic on subframe connectors. | SlowStang2 | Windsor Power | 3 | 08-15-2001 05:39 PM |
| Standard or full length subframes? | Chris_H | Windsor Power | 6 | 01-10-2001 10:03 AM |
